I clicked “like” but this article is pretty terrible and unfortunately typical of the Bulwark (and why I probably won’t resubscribe). First, Biden’s immigration policies are, except for caged children, more restrictive than Trump’s. He’s had actual buy-in from Mexico, not the lip service paid by Trump. And the wall is mostly useless exce…
I clicked “like” but this article is pretty terrible and unfortunately typical of the Bulwark (and why I probably won’t resubscribe). First, Biden’s immigration policies are, except for caged children, more restrictive than Trump’s. He’s had actual buy-in from Mexico, not the lip service paid by Trump. And the wall is mostly useless except for rhetoric. But the media - not only Fox but everyone - won’t given Biden “credit”. Because it’s not theater and Biden doesn’t beat his chest every day.
And then the Bulwark referenced polls and the anti-Trump coalition, as usual lately, without a SINGLE suggestion on how to reverse it, assuming it’s real and nearly a year out it means something. And if that’s the coverage I’m getting from the Bulwark staff, I don’t actually need to subscribe.
I clicked “like” but this article is pretty terrible and unfortunately typical of the Bulwark (and why I probably won’t resubscribe). First, Biden’s immigration policies are, except for caged children, more restrictive than Trump’s. He’s had actual buy-in from Mexico, not the lip service paid by Trump. And the wall is mostly useless except for rhetoric. But the media - not only Fox but everyone - won’t given Biden “credit”. Because it’s not theater and Biden doesn’t beat his chest every day.
And then the Bulwark referenced polls and the anti-Trump coalition, as usual lately, without a SINGLE suggestion on how to reverse it, assuming it’s real and nearly a year out it means something. And if that’s the coverage I’m getting from the Bulwark staff, I don’t actually need to subscribe.