The discussion of Trump's "debate prep" sounds like preparing a cranky toddler for a wedding, or for Midnight Mass at Easter: an iffy prospect at best. And I'm not sure that depending on Tulsi Gabbard as an expert is such a good idea: 1. for all her shortcomings, Gabbard is still smarter than Trump and more able to sustain a coherent attack; 2. Gabbard at that time attacked Harris from the Left, about a part of her resumé -- her record as a prosecutor -- of which she was and is justly proud, but she was running from at the time for political reasons; 3. Harris has stopped running now and is doubling down on authenticity: an authentic prosecutor against an authentic felon. Bad news for the felon, and worse news the more chances he gives her to repeat the comparison.
The discussion of Trump's "debate prep" sounds like preparing a cranky toddler for a wedding, or for Midnight Mass at Easter: an iffy prospect at best. And I'm not sure that depending on Tulsi Gabbard as an expert is such a good idea: 1. for all her shortcomings, Gabbard is still smarter than Trump and more able to sustain a coherent attack; 2. Gabbard at that time attacked Harris from the Left, about a part of her resumé -- her record as a prosecutor -- of which she was and is justly proud, but she was running from at the time for political reasons; 3. Harris has stopped running now and is doubling down on authenticity: an authentic prosecutor against an authentic felon. Bad news for the felon, and worse news the more chances he gives her to repeat the comparison.