Maybe. But before that, it's a platform for her to look good. She doesn't even have to be perfectly brilliant or anything. She's a former prosecutor. She's done it before. She just has to be clear and reasonable. He'll look like a fool. There's a reason Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger glowed at the J6 hearings. They spoke clearly and directly. Sometimes I swear the Dems -- although they have all the talking points and arguments to speak to the majority of the electorate -- can't string a clear, jargon du jour-free sentence together between them.
Seriously? Debating on Fox adds legitimacy to that reprehensible channel filled with lies and liars.
Maybe. But before that, it's a platform for her to look good. She doesn't even have to be perfectly brilliant or anything. She's a former prosecutor. She's done it before. She just has to be clear and reasonable. He'll look like a fool. There's a reason Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger glowed at the J6 hearings. They spoke clearly and directly. Sometimes I swear the Dems -- although they have all the talking points and arguments to speak to the majority of the electorate -- can't string a clear, jargon du jour-free sentence together between them.
I agree with Willie. She could do an interview but only if FOX first admits the lies that they have told. Seems easy enough.
She just needs to remind everybody there are 787 million reasons not go on fox for anything with trump.