Again what evidence do you have for what you have are stating. Please provide evidence of where Mr. Khalil lied about himself when coming into the US and provide evidence with sources as to him being an ‘active agent of Hamas’. So far you have provided no proof of anything only widely defamatory accusations.
If you want people to ‘think deeply about thing’ then I suggest you do a better job of providing actual evidence and sources for what you are saying.
When someone demands evidence for the manifestly clear, you have to assume their insincerity. Their intent is not inquiry but obstruction through a performance of doubt. No amount of proof will satisfy those already convinced or committed to feigned skepticism.
Except there are statements Mr. Khalil has made and they are available. That is what I am basing by assessment off of. I am not going to go down some conspiracy theory rabbit hole of non-evidence which you are promoting.
You don’t help yourself by calling me a whiny little bitch and then spelling ‘bitch’ wrong.
> conspiracy theory rabbit hole of non-evidence which you are promoting.
So, you are promoting the idea that Khalil did not lie to get into the country, and that he did nothing to promote Hamas and intimidate Jewish students, just because you also promote the Hamas point of view and will do anything to make it look innocuous like any other free speech issue. It is not.
The fact that you lie and said I misspelled "bitch" because I typoed a "j" on to the end of bitch doesn't really support your argument, and that fact that you tried to make a big deal about it makes you look desperate for a retortj. Get it?
Hi Bruce,
Again what evidence do you have for what you have are stating. Please provide evidence of where Mr. Khalil lied about himself when coming into the US and provide evidence with sources as to him being an ‘active agent of Hamas’. So far you have provided no proof of anything only widely defamatory accusations.
If you want people to ‘think deeply about thing’ then I suggest you do a better job of providing actual evidence and sources for what you are saying.
When someone demands evidence for the manifestly clear, you have to assume their insincerity. Their intent is not inquiry but obstruction through a performance of doubt. No amount of proof will satisfy those already convinced or committed to feigned skepticism.
--Hussein Aboubakr Mansour
Except there are statements Mr. Khalil has made and they are available. That is what I am basing by assessment off of. I am not going to go down some conspiracy theory rabbit hole of non-evidence which you are promoting.
You don’t help yourself by calling me a whiny little bitch and then spelling ‘bitch’ wrong.
> conspiracy theory rabbit hole of non-evidence which you are promoting.
So, you are promoting the idea that Khalil did not lie to get into the country, and that he did nothing to promote Hamas and intimidate Jewish students, just because you also promote the Hamas point of view and will do anything to make it look innocuous like any other free speech issue. It is not.
The fact that you lie and said I misspelled "bitch" because I typoed a "j" on to the end of bitch doesn't really support your argument, and that fact that you tried to make a big deal about it makes you look desperate for a retortj. Get it?