I suspect the problem is the "fake news" automatic response to everything contra-Trump.
One could argue that the Bragg prosecution was overzealous (but still perfectly legal, btw), but what about the rest? Documents? Capitol "riots"? Georgia?
If those things were "lawfare", then I think the question is: what *isn't* lawfare when it comes to Trump? Is there any law he could egregiously break that merits prosecution?
I suspect the problem is the "fake news" automatic response to everything contra-Trump.
One could argue that the Bragg prosecution was overzealous (but still perfectly legal, btw), but what about the rest? Documents? Capitol "riots"? Georgia?
If those things were "lawfare", then I think the question is: what *isn't* lawfare when it comes to Trump? Is there any law he could egregiously break that merits prosecution?