There's a lot of Mona-hating in the Bulwark comments as a whole, and I can't say I understand it. In this case specifically, though, I don't think it's warranted. She didn't endorse his behavior; in fact, it's the opposite. She simply observed the realities that A) in general, each political group has more favorable views of "our guys" than they do of "their guys", and B) that though his behavior doesn't look good and certainly warrants attention, it's simply not illegal. And that's because there is very little legally required. How we feel about these facts shouldn't have any influence on how we feel about the messenger.
There's a lot of Mona-hating in the Bulwark comments as a whole, and I can't say I understand it. In this case specifically, though, I don't think it's warranted. She didn't endorse his behavior; in fact, it's the opposite. She simply observed the realities that A) in general, each political group has more favorable views of "our guys" than they do of "their guys", and B) that though his behavior doesn't look good and certainly warrants attention, it's simply not illegal. And that's because there is very little legally required. How we feel about these facts shouldn't have any influence on how we feel about the messenger.
Agree. We need to save the nasty for LYING FUCKERS like Tucker, Trump, Jordan etc.
Thanks, Walter.
Completely agree.