No because they still have a purpose for me. That said, if there was a referendum on handing in certain firearms, I'd readily vote in favor of the restriction from purchasing them and the repossession of many firearms, even ones I own.
What would you think of being required to carry insurance for the guns you own? Some kind of responsibility if they are misused somehow. I've heard that idea floated in the past.
At this point, I'm open to a lot of ideas. If each gun I owned continued to cost me money after I purchased it, it would probably deter me from owning superfluous guns (and what a superfluous gun is would be impacted by the burden of owning it).
No because they still have a purpose for me. That said, if there was a referendum on handing in certain firearms, I'd readily vote in favor of the restriction from purchasing them and the repossession of many firearms, even ones I own.
What would you think of being required to carry insurance for the guns you own? Some kind of responsibility if they are misused somehow. I've heard that idea floated in the past.
At this point, I'm open to a lot of ideas. If each gun I owned continued to cost me money after I purchased it, it would probably deter me from owning superfluous guns (and what a superfluous gun is would be impacted by the burden of owning it).