Yes, you were making an inference from circumstantial evidence. BTW, circumstantial evidence IS factual. It just doesn't directly prove the fact it's presented to prove as direct evidence does.
I point this out only to say that with all the bullshit MAGA believes, circumstantial evidence alone is not going to persuade them. They can find other interpretations as they are enormously skilled at doing. But if they were to see a photograph of Trump with a topless underage girl on his lap that Michael Wolff claims the FBI has in their possession (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmvTIZSz5y4&t=20s), and it was by all reliable accounts valid, that would be pretty damning.
Yes, you were making an inference from circumstantial evidence. BTW, circumstantial evidence IS factual. It just doesn't directly prove the fact it's presented to prove as direct evidence does.
I point this out only to say that with all the bullshit MAGA believes, circumstantial evidence alone is not going to persuade them. They can find other interpretations as they are enormously skilled at doing. But if they were to see a photograph of Trump with a topless underage girl on his lap that Michael Wolff claims the FBI has in their possession (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmvTIZSz5y4&t=20s), and it was by all reliable accounts valid, that would be pretty damning.