As an attorney, I routinely advise colleagues to remove inflammatory rhetoric from their briefs because it's not persuasive, and can often alienate the judge. After all, if your argument is truly strong, state it simply - there's no need for theatrics. That said, I wholeheartedly support Mr. Perticone continuing to set his phaser to kill.
Well, sometimes the simple truth IS inflammatory. I would suggest that Andrew Tate has never been more accurately cast than by "online misogynist shitfuck." Never mind the syntactic beauty of blending Latin, Greek, Old English, and Germanic derivatives in one elegant brushstroke.
As an attorney, I routinely advise colleagues to remove inflammatory rhetoric from their briefs because it's not persuasive, and can often alienate the judge. After all, if your argument is truly strong, state it simply - there's no need for theatrics. That said, I wholeheartedly support Mr. Perticone continuing to set his phaser to kill.
Well, sometimes the simple truth IS inflammatory. I would suggest that Andrew Tate has never been more accurately cast than by "online misogynist shitfuck." Never mind the syntactic beauty of blending Latin, Greek, Old English, and Germanic derivatives in one elegant brushstroke.
Mr. Egger?
Good lord, I attributed the article to Andrew Egger, rather than Joe Perticone. (Fixed now). Thanks for catching that!
Well, I was an editor on both my high school and college newspapersтАжI correct my husbandтАЩs spelling and whatever. Thankfully he puts up with it.