And yet on historical examination, there is a lot of it there, in a quiet dog-whistle-ly kind of way (and more openly these days). Conservatism has always been fighting a battle against this element in their ranks. Just ask WF Buckley. Lately they seem to have given up.
Are there people with inherent bias in a lot of places--well, actually, there are people with inherent bias EVERYWHERE.
Who has been dog whistling (and being increasingly open about it to the point of espousing racial replacement theory as a mainstream party idea) the crap out of it for the last 40 years or more for political advantage?
And yet on historical examination, there is a lot of it there, in a quiet dog-whistle-ly kind of way (and more openly these days). Conservatism has always been fighting a battle against this element in their ranks. Just ask WF Buckley. Lately they seem to have given up.
Are there people with inherent bias in a lot of places--well, actually, there are people with inherent bias EVERYWHERE.
Who has been dog whistling (and being increasingly open about it to the point of espousing racial replacement theory as a mainstream party idea) the crap out of it for the last 40 years or more for political advantage?