The Bulwark is home to Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller, Bill Kristol, JVL, Sam Stein, and more. We are the largest pro-democracy bundle on Substack for news and analysis on politics and culture—supported by a community built on good-faith.

Over 822,000 subscribers
By subscribing, I agree to Substack’s Terms of Use and acknowledge its Information Collection Notice and Privacy Policy
“This is the political website we should all aspire to. Underpinned by a common commitment to democracy and social liberalism, Bulwark+ combines rage, wisdom, humour and community. For $100 (toy money, anyway) a year, you get A LOT.”
Tim Gwynn Jones, Twenty-four two
“The Bulwark publishes smart, original and important analyses by some of our best writers across a broad spectrum a political and social concerns. The reason I found it a great place to write also makes it great place for thoughtful readers.”
Richard North Patterson, Richard’s Substack
“Bulwark+ The Swiss Army knife of political content. It’s all useful…even the plastic tooth...”
D. L. Wright, Complaisant. Complacent. Complicit.
The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Shows
Newsletters
Special Projects
Events
Founders
Store
Archive
About

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
Trump Finally Met an Adversary Totally Immune to His Bullshit
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
The Triad

Trump Finally Met an Adversary Totally Immune to His Bullshit

And it’s not the Supreme Court.

Jonathan V. Last's avatar
Jonathan V. Last
Apr 11, 2025
∙ Paid
1,215

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
Trump Finally Met an Adversary Totally Immune to His Bullshit
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
585
167
Share

Switcherooney: Today I’m hosting the flagship pod and Tim is sitting in for me on the Secret show with Sarah.

Moving on: We’re going to talk about Trump’s huge vulnerability in a moment. But first I want to do a quick detour about last night’s Supreme Court ruling, because it illustrates the difference between an adversary that Trump can manipulate and an adversary that is implacable and immune to his machinations.


(Photo by Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

1. Abrego Garcia

I am not convinced that the Supreme Court’s 9–0 ruling that the government must “facilitate” the repatriation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia is as encouraging as some people hope.

Why?

Because the Court is working under the assumption of regularity.

The Court uses a bunch of careful language to craft a ruling that a normal administration would abide by. The underlying assumption is: This administration is not lawless. They will respect the ruling and work in good faith to execute the Court’s order.

This stance assumes facts not in evidence.

What happens if the Trump administration doesn’t comply in good faith? What happens if the administration says, “Yes, we tried to get Abrego Garcia back, but Bukele won’t play ball.” Or, “We cannot facilitate this exchange because of national security concerns.”

How will the Court respond? It can’t make El Salvador send Abrego Garcia back. And it will have to take the administration at its word because, as Asha Rangappa notes, Trump’s interactions with foreign leaders are covered by executive privilege. If Trump says, “I tried but it’s not happening,” then what is the Court going to do about it?

The Supreme Court—once again—does not understand the reality in which it exists. And because it is delusional about its situation, it can be bullied, deceived, and manipulated to serve Trump’s ends.

Share


2. Yield

You know what can’t be bullied, deceived, or manipulated?

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Bulwark to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Bulwark Media
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More