In what sane world does an "absolute security failure" on the Israelis part in any way justify killing 40,000 non-combatants??? Why is only Israels security ever trumpeted while apparently any other civilian in the region is acceptable collateral damage?? Why is Netenyahoos political and legal survival never mentioned when clearly this scale of destruction would never have happened without the right wing zealots keeping him in power???
In what sane world does an "absolute security failure" on the Israelis part in any way justify killing 40,000 non-combatants??? Why is only Israels security ever trumpeted while apparently any other civilian in the region is acceptable collateral damage?? Why is Netenyahoos political and legal survival never mentioned when clearly this scale of destruction would never have happened without the right wing zealots keeping him in power???