It just feels like they're trying to hide something from us.
Can you imagine the Washington Post allowing the NYT to report on things the Post reporters were doing and not reporting on it themselves?
The only thing I can infer is that the meeting didn't give ammunition for the preferred narrative, so it gets memory holed.
Or they were told to hold off for some reason.
Hadn't thought of that.
It just feels like they're trying to hide something from us.
Can you imagine the Washington Post allowing the NYT to report on things the Post reporters were doing and not reporting on it themselves?
The only thing I can infer is that the meeting didn't give ammunition for the preferred narrative, so it gets memory holed.
Or they were told to hold off for some reason.
Hadn't thought of that.