606 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Jennifer's avatar

It's nice that the Bulwark guys buried it, right?

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

How was it "buried" ? - "Cheap Shots" is one I always read.

And you don't need an essay from Bill or Andrew to explain the implied threat.

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

Pretty sure we need more essays from Bill and Andrew on the threat. But their focus is Biden right now.

And 'cheap shots' is burying the lead.

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

What we need is the Biden campaign to put these things front and center. Make the campaign about how Trump's people are insane.

Expand full comment
Paul K. Ogden's avatar

Agreed. By putting it in "Cheap Shots" instead of in a long narrative, it gets more exposure, not less.

Expand full comment
Theresa's avatar

Agreed, it closes down the TLDR of it all!!!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 3, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark P's avatar

To be fair, having Hunter involved in high-level discussions right now is politically indefensible.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 3, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Mark P's avatar

Apparently there are multiple reports of Hunter attending White House political meetings (not family meetings). It doesn't really matter which meetings he's attending, he shouldn't be within 1000 feet of the White House right now if he cares anything about his father. I mean it's not the biggest issue in the world, but it's just another point that contributes to the impression that Joe is shutting out everyone but his closest circle of advisors and family members, instead of reaching out to prominent Democrats and convincing them he is still up to the job.

Expand full comment
Mike Lew's avatar

To be fair, the Biden must go narrative won't write itself.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 3, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Double-A's avatar

I would vote for a comatose Biden if it's against Trump. It doesn't matter whom I personally vote for... what matters in the election is whom several tens of thousands of swing voters in key states vote for. And this is why how Biden presents himself to the people at large matters greatly for this, the highest-stakes election of our lives. The folks against Trump will not waver. It's the swing voters we badly need to keep our democracy alive.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 3, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Double-A's avatar

What matters is not what Kristol and Eggers write for their audience (I doubt that any Bulwark subscriber is an undecided swing voter) but how Biden is seen by those swing voters I mentioned whose votes will decide the election and the fate of democracy in our country. All sufficiently educated or knowledgeable people know there is a considerable apparatus surrounding the President that takes care of the details, but big decisions ultimately end up with the big guy. This is why it matters how the President comes across to the people at large.

All of us here want the same end-result - defeat of a would-be autocrat. The question is about the best set of tactics to get us from here to that end-result, which will be decided in just over 4 months.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 3, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Chris Considine's avatar

Prepare to lose

Expand full comment
Theresa's avatar

Jennifer, have you been on the Bulwark site? Since the ruling, there have been a bevy of articles in regard to the outcome. Perhaps not written by Bill, Andrew, Tim, etc.... but folks who actually have expertise in the area. I am pretty sure at this point; we all know how awful the threat is. It will be even worse if the Dems lose the presidency and Trump gets to name some more to the court. This ruling makes the Biden crisis an even bigger deal.

Expand full comment