Crenshaw is filth. He's an ethical weathervane. Periodically he'll do something that resembles a príncipled act or statement and then he'll promptly ruin it.
Crenshaw is filth. He's an ethical weathervane. Periodically he'll do something that resembles a príncipled act or statement and then he'll promptly ruin it.
He and Mace together don’t equal a “three eyed raven” - but in the current republican caucus they really are part of the ‘deep thinkers’ caucus - which is a very small group
No, there was some fracas with him early on, and he went on Saturday Night Live and gave a reasonable speech, IIRC. Seemed like he might be legit. Alas, 'twas not to be.
Crenshaw is filth. He's an ethical weathervane. Periodically he'll do something that resembles a príncipled act or statement and then he'll promptly ruin it.
He's a slightly starchier Lindsey Graham.
Not to be too on the nose, but in the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.
He and Mace together don’t equal a “three eyed raven” - but in the current republican caucus they really are part of the ‘deep thinkers’ caucus - which is a very small group
He and Nancy Mace. Birds of a feather.
Amen!
They should form the "Look at me, Look at me" caucus.
When I look up 'damning with faint praise' going forward, I'm going to see:
"He's a slightly starchier Lindsey Graham." - Josh on The Bulwark 10/16/23
Yeah, I had high hopes for him initially, and he does occasionally appear to show some ethical backbone, but you're right: he always ruins it.
Showing ethical backbone is more than a here or there in an elected official.
No, there was some fracas with him early on, and he went on Saturday Night Live and gave a reasonable speech, IIRC. Seemed like he might be legit. Alas, 'twas not to be.