Would a donor revolt be "saving" American Universities if the big donor refused to write checks until the Poli Sci and History departments got on board with teaching that Biden stole the 2020 election? If they shouldn't do that, why should they be directing the position of the faculty and administration on other political statements?
Would a donor revolt be "saving" American Universities if the big donor refused to write checks until the Poli Sci and History departments got on board with teaching that Biden stole the 2020 election? If they shouldn't do that, why should they be directing the position of the faculty and administration on other political statements?
Would a donor revolt be "saving" American Universities if the big donor refused to write checks until the Poli Sci and History departments got on board with teaching that Biden stole the 2020 election? If they shouldn't do that, why should they be directing the position of the faculty and administration on other political statements?
The real question is can a donor revolt save the Republican Party?
Not gonna happen. They're just fine with it. It's what they wanted.
Now that IS a question worth asking.