
Elemental, the latest from Disney/Pixar, hits theaters this weekend. Itās fineāof the pandemic and post-pandemic efforts from Disney, Iād probably rank it as either the best or second-best, after Soul, and itās roughly a thousand times better than Strange World or Lightyearāand the reviews are okay, but itās about to die an ugly death at the box office. Tracking has its three-day numbers in the low-to-mid $30 million range, meaning that even if it holds well, as kidsā movies often do, itās going to have a tough time recouping its budget.
Much ink will be spilled about this filmās failure, if that failure comes to pass. Is it because Disney has gone woke and is now going broke? (Probably not, judging by The Little Mermaidās $239 million and counting, domestic.) Is it because Disney has destroyed their business model by moving so much of their product to Disney+ during the pandemic in an effort to jumpstart their streaming audience, thus training audiences to stay home? (Maybe, though Universal/Illumination has demonstrated that pictures like The Super Mario Bros. Movie and Puss in Boots can coexist digitally and theatrically.) Is it because the movies simply arenāt as good as they used to be as a result of Pixarās internal creative dynamics? (That certainly applied to Lightyear and Strange World, which were bad, though Iām always hesitant to conflate āwhat audiences show up forā and āwhat is good.ā After all, there are 11 Fast and Furious movies.)
Gun to my head, Iād say itās some combination of the last two things: audiences have been trained by Disney to stay home for Disney movies and the Disney movies that have gotten theatrical releases recently have not been very good. That said, audiences have demonstrated that theyāre willing to show up for animated movies. And here are the animated movies theyāve shown up for: Spider-Man: Across the Spiderverse (a sequel that is at least tangentially related to the Marvel Cinematic Universe); The Super Mario Bros. Movie (which is based on arguably the most beloved video game franchise of all time, with multiple generations of fans clamoring to see Chris Pratt voice their beloved plumber on the big screen); and Minions: The Rise of Gru (the fifth movie in the Despicable Me series).
In other words: theyāre showing up for intellectual property they recognize.
Hereās the thing: animation is pretty expensive. All of those movies reportedly had budgets around $100 million, before marketing. Pixar movies are even more expensive, which helps explain why they typically look so great: Elemental and Lightyear reportedly cost $200 million each; Turning Red around $175 million; Soul another $150 million. I donāt need to run you through too much box office math to explain why that kind of spending on movies that make a pittance from theaters isnāt really sustainable.
Note that, with the exception of Lightyear (the connection of which to the Toy Story movies was so convoluted audiences couldnāt figure it out, thus defeating the purpose), these are all originals. And for years now, animation has been one of the few reliable avenues for big-budget, non-franchise fare to find an audience. Pictures like Encanto, Coco, Moana, Zootopia, Inside Out, Frozen: all hits, all originals, all fairly expensive to make. If you get lucky, they might spawn a franchise like Frozen. But they can also stand on their own.
Thatās different from getting people to show up for Mario or Spider-Man or the Minions. People came to theaters for these films because they feel like events in the way that a MCU movie or a Fast and Furious movie or a Jurassic movie feel like events. People have demonstrated repeatedly that they will show up to theaters for events. They are less likely to show up for original stuff they donāt recognize and that will be on streaming in a month or two anyway. All of which is to say that if youāre going to spend nine figures on an animated movie, youāre looking at these results and thinking to yourself that thereās no universe in which youāre risking it on a non-franchise picture.
Welcome to the IP era of animation.
Speaking of IP, on Across the Movie Aisle this Friday, we discussed toys we want to see made into movies. Or, in some cases, donāt want to see.
Links!
How is The Flash kinda-sorta like Volcano? Glad you asked! Read my review to find out. (Warning: some spoilers for the movie in this weekās review, so donāt click through if youāre going to get cranky about that sort of thing.)
I had a really fun time at the Dallas Fan Expo last weekend to do Aaron Reynoldsās Bootleg Safari show. The Simpsons knockoff t-shirts I brought to bear are ⦠outstanding. And tasteless. Outstandingly tasteless, some might say. Give it a watch!
The censorship of The French Connection should be getting more play in film media and Iām kind of surprised it hasnāt been.
Hope you enjoyed last weekās Bulwark Goes to Hollywood with Arthur Smith, the exec behind Hellās Kitchen and American Ninja Warrior. This week Iām talking to Brooks Barnes about his great NYT piece on Universalās foray into premium video on demand (PVOD) and how itās helped them find what they believe to be a brand-new audience segment.
Look, everyone knows that certain elements of biopics are, shall we say, massaged to help create narrative momentum. Still, itās very funny that Fox Searchlight made a movie out of the guy who claimed to invent Flaminā Hot Cheetos but, in fact, totally made up his story.
RIP Cormac McCarthy. Make sure to read Bill Ryanās essay on his final two books. For what itās worth, my favorite of his works is the screenplay for The Counselor, which has, in recent years, been reevaluated a bit with more people coming to the position I held at the time of its release: itās a dang masterpiece.
Assigned Viewing: Mission: ImpossibleāGhost Protocol (Paramount+)
Iām rewatching all of these because, aside from the first, Iāve only seen each of them once, during their initial release. Itās kind of interesting to watch the series evolve from an auteurist showcase in the first (Brian De Palma), second (John Woo), and third (J.J. Abrams) to a Tom Cruise showcase in Ghost Protocol on. I think the moment the series fully switches gears is during the Burj Khalifa climb: before that, most of Tom Cruiseās stunts (the helicopter tunnel chase in the first, say, or the bridge sequence in the third) are obviously green-screened to a certain extent. But with the Khalifa sequence the camera is frequently on him, on his face, watching him climb. And, importantly, the movie was marketed as ālook at Tom Cruise doing insane stuff! He might die! For your entertainment!ā That continues through to Dead Reckoning, which has been sold to audiences by having us see him jump off a mountain on a motorcycle.
Sonny, I've gone down some weird trails with you, but this Aaron Reynolds's BOOTLEG SAFARI is one of the greatest. When I opened my GIANT NON-THEFT package of Gillette blades from Amazon this morning, I couldn't help thinking: Why NON-THEFT? These came from their warehouse. Are they bootleg or fenced retail goods? Thank you both for extending my doddering paranoia!
I remember attending an animation festival in Raleigh, NC circa 1994-ish. Pixar presented their short with the lamps and said they were working on the first ever fully computer animated film (Toy Story). They handed out investor packets, but I was on my way to by a twelver of Natural LIght with my friends and that's all the cash I had. Missed opportunity.
Pixar's trick was always sort of keeping the metaphor in the background. Classics like The Incredibles, Wall-E, and Up were metaphors but they weren't too on the nose. There's been a shift now and it feels like they've lost the "thing" they had. W/R/T animated movies and franchises, I think the Marvel Universe films are bad movies with great moments. But people will turn out for one more iteration of "dangerous things are scattered around the universe and our hero has to find them before the bad guy does" ad nauseum.