The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Shows
Newsletters
Chat
Special Projects
Events
Founders
Store
Archive
About

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The World Is Moving on Without Us
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
The Triad

The World Is Moving on Without Us

How Europe and China are approaching the new world order.

Jonathan V. Last's avatar
Jonathan V. Last
May 12, 2025
∙ Paid
864

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The World Is Moving on Without Us
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
660
121
Share

Bonus Secret! Sarah and I taped a Monday Secret show talking about the plane, the big, beautiful China trade deal, and Trump’s absolutely-don’t-call-it-socialism price controls.

Keep an eye out for the show this afternoon.


German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU), French President Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of Great Britain, arrive at Kiev Central Station on a special train. The four heads of state and government want to meet the country's president in the Ukrainian capital to campaign for a 30-day ceasefire. (Photo by Kay Nietfeld/picture alliance via Getty Images)

1. Big News

Two big pieces of geostrategic news last week. The first was the selection of an American pope, which can be read as the Catholic Church no longer viewing the United States as the exceptional leader in world affairs.

You’ve already read a lot about that.

The second piece was much quieter: France and Germany announced that they are creating a joint defense council. Which is tantamount to saying that the two largest economies in Europe believe that NATO is dead and a new security order must be created. Without the United States.

Before we get into the details of what this means, I want to share something that Eric and Eliot talked about on our Shield of the Republic podcast a couple weeks ago.

One way to think about the start of World War II is that it broke out at a very specific moment—a moment when, following the end of World War I, Great Britain was no longer capable of leading the world order but the United States was not yet willing to lead it.

As Eric and Eliot pointed out, our current moment half-rhymes with that:

The United States is no longer willing to lead the world order, but China is not yet capable of leading it.

Once you understand this dynamic, a bunch of things about the future become clear.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Bulwark Media
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More