Why Do Republicans Have a Selective Ability to Understand the Law?
When it comes to grasping complicated legal technicalities, Republican voters are weirdly inconsistent.
If you care, the NYT asked me for short thoughts on Trump’s strength as a candidate. You can find them here. I won’t lie: Some of the contributions to this roundtable are . . . ridiculous.
1. Kyle Rittenhouse
Over the weekend a number of elected Republicans—and not just MAGA apologists, but Good Republicans, too—explained that most Republicans can’t possibly tell the difference between the alleged crimes for which Donald Trump has been indicted and the garden-variety mishandling of government documents in other cases.
This is a strange claim. Why is it that these elite Republicans believe that their voters can’t understand relatively straightforward facts and law in a case where there is literally a tape of the defendant explaining his state of mind at the time of the alleged crime?
Because in other, more nuanced, cases Republican voters have been remarkably sophisticated in their legal analysis. Let’s take a look.
Join Bulwark+ to unlock the rest
Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. A subscription gets you:
- Unlimited access to articles and newsletters including The Triad by JVL and Receipts by Catherine Rampell.
- Ad-free editions of our shows (with transcripts) and member-only shows like The Secret Podcast.
- Plus community chats and commenting features. Your support helps keep our work sustainable and available to those who cannot afford a membership. Cancel anytime.