
Trump Exploits "Fake News." The Media Must Do Better.
It doesn't take much to feed the president's victimization complex.

Itās been a bad couple of weeks for the mainstream mediaās efforts to combat the Trump White Houseās āFake Newsā meme. First came the BuzzFeed exclusive claiming that the special counsel had evidence that Donald Trump had told Michael Cohen to lie to Congress, which prompted the tight-lipped Robert Mueller team to issue a statement denying the claims. Then there the was the rush to judgment on the Covington Catholic kids at the Lincoln Memorial.
The media was broken long before Donald Trump came along. But Trump ā a creature of the mass media if there ever was one ā has always known how to exploit it for his benefit.
In an era in which clickbait is king, agendas matter more than facts, and ideological silos all but ensure it will only get worse.Itās on the media to fix itself before itās too late.
Report facts.
Itās always the simple things we forget the most.
How did journalism go from āwho, what, where, and whenā to āwhy, oh why, is everything this way?ā There is a place for opinion-based analysis if authors are up front, but that doesnāt excuse a daily newspaper, cable news outfit, or other ānonpartisan, non-politicalā entity to cover one side fairly while doing all it can to butcher the other.
If a New York Times reporter feels he or she must push an agenda, then go find a job at The Nation or Slate or National Review.
If that doesnāt appeal, political campaigns can always use another communications flack.
Speed kills.
Nothing has done more damage to good reporting than the creation of the 24/7 cable news cycle and the Internet. They are gaping maws demanding ever-more content, and being first ends up mattering more than being accurate. Weāve seen how that works out.
And you wonder how a meme like āFake Newsā begins?
Does anyone in the upper floors of New York Cityās Rockefeller Center (MSNBC), the Avenue of Americas (Fox News), or Columbus Circle (CNN) care their desire to āBe Firstā has gradually undermined their credibility? Clearly not, since all that seems to matter these days is click rates, ad revenue, and eyeballs.
Narratives are for spin rooms.
āFlooding the Zoneā is a stupid phrase fit more to describe a defensive scheme in basketball. Itās actually a marketing term designed to ensure maximum manipulation by those inundating the media with their side of events.
With reporting being crowded out by narrative, weāve seen reporters go from truth-seekers to storytelling salespersons in the same timeframe. Look at how many stories of national and international importance, say the Venezuelan coup, were largely ignored while we fought about Twitter-spread videos of a bunch of teenagers wearing MAGA hats as a Native American beat a drum in one young manās face.
Speaking of social media, media outlets cover it as if it were real news. Think Iām joking? The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel had a reporter explain how people were ālosing their minds on Twitterā over the news Miller Park; home of the Milwaukee Brewers, was about to get a name change.
Was it compelling stuff? No. Did it provide online content? Yes. Was it part of a growing narrative which the Milwaukee area media will exploit for time eternal? Heck yeah!
Politics is not a sport.
Politics is boring. Itās meant to be a debate on ideas, policies, and pieces of legislation. The Founders never anticipated it to be the all-encompassing pursuit of oneās life.
Yet, for far too many of us, it is. Now the constant media updates on politicians, personalities, and campaigns give off the feel of sideline reporting during a football game.
āWell Mark, I just spoke with Congressman Smith and he says his ankleās fine and should be able to vote for the Pointless Piece of Legislation Act once he gets treatment during caucus. Looks like it will be a close vote. Stay tuned to catch all the gripping drama of the roll call.ā
Gripping roll call vote drama? Have you watched C-SPAN? Itās TV to nap to!
Yet, thatās exactly what weāve done with our political coverage. We have pundit panels debate the most minute details of the news day. Analytics-obsessed math nerds crunch the numbers like theyāre baseball stats. Polls are dissected enough to make Frank Luntz and Charles Franklin blush.
Think Iām overreacting? This was Bulwark contributor A.B. Stoddard last week on The Federalist podcast:
āSince Iāve covered Congress, Iāve gone from seeing the Congress do a lot a things together to doing a lot of things in a partisan manner; but still big things, to doing nothing. And I think that, because thereās not a lot of consequence going on, everyone thinks they have to cover Beto OāRourke having a camera of his teeth in the dental chair, āBecause, Wow! Heās a big player.ā So itās like a sports game. You cover the players, but the game has become indifferent, because thereās not a lot of meat to the game anymore.
So, itās such a combination of the media becoming a business, they need conflict to fuel ratings to get the bucks. Trump feeds that and heās such a perfect storm of all these things which are not good and Iām in your [Federalist co-founder Ben Domenech] camp and I donāt know how we dial it back.ā
And you wonder why ideas and policy stopped mattering?
Be āhistoryās first draft,ā not an activist.
Do top journalism schools like Columbia or Northwestern change their approach in teaching the next generation of students to deal with these issues in the industry or do we continue down the current path?
One of the most tired tropes is asking j-school students āWhy did you enter the field?ā knowing that for many, the hours are long, the pay not so great, and the professionās continued uncertainty in the digital age. Often the answer comes down to āI want to change the world.ā
What that exactly means is different for everyone. Thereās nothing wrong with wanting to change the world or better your community. But such an answer gives the impression many budding journalists choose the field only to be activists instead of truth-seekers.
Like many conservatives I mistrust the media and have seen too many open examples of bias not to believe there are reporters who are picking sides. But those who cheer the demise of the press -- as happened last week when BuzzFeed and the Huffington Post announced layoffs -- should know that a weak or non-existent presswould lead only to even further chaos.