Discussion about this post

User's avatar
IlyaF's avatar

As much as I enjoyed watching Hassan dismantle Taibbi, I wish he talked more about the lies of omission by Taibbi, not just the sloppy mistakes. Sloppy mistakes can be dismissed as honest mistakes. But the lies of omission cannot.

In the very first Twitter files, which was about the decision making process that made Twitter "censor" the NY Post article about Hunter Biden laptop, there was not a single mention of certain important contextual facts in which that decision was made. No mention of the fact that the source of the story was Giuliani, who had torched his credibility, not just by lying for Trump, but by explicitly partnering with (recently indicted, btw) Russian agent Andriy Derkach in order to find dirt on Hunter Biden. In this context, the decision looks much more reasonable, but this context was entirely omitted. It's almost as if Matt was acting as a hired hack with a narrative to push, and not a journalist.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/accused-russian-agent-andriy-derkach-called-rudy-giuliani-very-useful-report-says

Expand full comment
Mark W. Bantz's avatar

Off subject. I just listened to Jeff Sharlet on Charlie’s podcast. I’m 77 and have lived in europe the last 11 years and am out of the loop with US news, but Mr. sharlet’s interview was damn scary about incels and guns. What has happened to my country? These people are forking crazy and very dangerous!

Expand full comment
209 more comments...

No posts