If you're going to have Jonathan Haidt on the podcast, please consider also reaching out to someone like Mike Masnick, who can speak to the ways Haidt distorts social media research and misunderstands tech policy. In line with the Bulwark's interest in truth-telling, I think it would be really valuable to platform someone who could make …
If you're going to have Jonathan Haidt on the podcast, please consider also reaching out to someone like Mike Masnick, who can speak to the ways Haidt distorts social media research and misunderstands tech policy. In line with the Bulwark's interest in truth-telling, I think it would be really valuable to platform someone who could make a forceful case in favor of things like Section 230 that draw passionate but often poorly conceived opposition. (Other people who might be worth contacting: on the social media research side, Candice Odgers or Andy Przybylski; on the tech policy side, Alice Marwick, Corbin Barthold or Kate Tummarello.)
If you're going to have Jonathan Haidt on the podcast, please consider also reaching out to someone like Mike Masnick, who can speak to the ways Haidt distorts social media research and misunderstands tech policy. In line with the Bulwark's interest in truth-telling, I think it would be really valuable to platform someone who could make a forceful case in favor of things like Section 230 that draw passionate but often poorly conceived opposition. (Other people who might be worth contacting: on the social media research side, Candice Odgers or Andy Przybylski; on the tech policy side, Alice Marwick, Corbin Barthold or Kate Tummarello.)