"There's no evidence for that claim. None." Evidence is determined by courts, not commenters. That's how the legal system works. I'm waiting for the actual evidence to be adduced and made public. Apparently you have some omniscient knowledge of all the actual evidence the rest of us lack. Or maybe you've just decided it doesn't matter.
"There's no evidence for that claim. None." Evidence is determined by courts, not commenters. That's how the legal system works. I'm waiting for the actual evidence to be adduced and made public. Apparently you have some omniscient knowledge of all the actual evidence the rest of us lack. Or maybe you've just decided it doesn't matter.
Agsin, as it seems you are unfamiliar with how the legal system actually functions, evidence is determined by courts, not by commenters like you. Sorry the workings of the legal system interfere with your preconceived notions.
You said тАЬbased on reportingтАЭ, not тАЬCourt accepted evidenceтАЭ.
Show this reporting or retract.
You know someone is bad faith when they make extraordinary claims, such as material sponsorship of terrorism, but canтАЩt back it up with extraordinary evidence, or in this case, literally any evidence at all.
The one rule of authoritarianism is that the autocrat comes for everyone eventually, green card holders and citizens alike.
When the autocrat comes for you - and he will come for you - I hope that you will demand more than тАЬletтАЩs wait and see what super secret evidence the government says it has on me, till then I am happy to stay in jailтАЭ.
I've shown the reporting. It was reported in the NY Post, and I provided the link. That's what reporting means. I also said I'm waiting to see if there is actual evidence as determined by a court. Enjoy your rhetorical word games. I'm out.
"There's no evidence for that claim. None." Evidence is determined by courts, not commenters. That's how the legal system works. I'm waiting for the actual evidence to be adduced and made public. Apparently you have some omniscient knowledge of all the actual evidence the rest of us lack. Or maybe you've just decided it doesn't matter.
тАЬEvidence is determined by courtsтАЭ
ThatтАЩs a very convenient semantic argument! There MIGHT be evidence, but we canтАЩt know for SURE till itтАЩs proven in Court?
Tell you what: IтАЩll accept video, photographs, admissions by Khalil, anything. Anything at all.
You got literally anything? Or just тАЬthe NYP saysтАЭ?
Agsin, as it seems you are unfamiliar with how the legal system actually functions, evidence is determined by courts, not by commenters like you. Sorry the workings of the legal system interfere with your preconceived notions.
You said тАЬbased on reportingтАЭ, not тАЬCourt accepted evidenceтАЭ.
Show this reporting or retract.
You know someone is bad faith when they make extraordinary claims, such as material sponsorship of terrorism, but canтАЩt back it up with extraordinary evidence, or in this case, literally any evidence at all.
The one rule of authoritarianism is that the autocrat comes for everyone eventually, green card holders and citizens alike.
When the autocrat comes for you - and he will come for you - I hope that you will demand more than тАЬletтАЩs wait and see what super secret evidence the government says it has on me, till then I am happy to stay in jailтАЭ.
I've shown the reporting. It was reported in the NY Post, and I provided the link. That's what reporting means. I also said I'm waiting to see if there is actual evidence as determined by a court. Enjoy your rhetorical word games. I'm out.
That's your "reporting"? The NYP article???
The NYP article was not "reporting". It was a White House press statement, transcribed under the NYP banner.
If you take that at all seriously, then you're not to be taken seriously.