I find it puzzling that this recap on the DNC completely ignored the fact that the DNC allowed an Israeli parent to speak at the convention, while offering no similar opportunity for a Palestinian.
In so doing the DMC was literally communicating that Palestian lives matter less than Israeli lives.
I find it puzzling that this recap on the DNC completely ignored the fact that the DNC allowed an Israeli parent to speak at the convention, while offering no similar opportunity for a Palestinian.
In so doing the DMC was literally communicating that Palestian lives matter less than Israeli lives.
If you hear the support at the DNC for recognizing the plight of Palestians in Gaza you'll realize that the DNC is out of step with its constituents.
Why would you not mention this at all? I know the Bulwark has a strong bias for Israel but this is getting fucking absurd for a media entity that CLAIMS to be committed to just reporting the facts, without bias.
“ n so doing the DMC was literally communicating that Palestian lives matter less than Israeli lives.”
No.
That statement is not a valid criticism.
The “DNC” (not DMC) allowed peaceful demonstrations supporting the Palestinians criticism Re GAZA, and the Israeli couple who spoke to the Convention about the humanitarian crisis referred to the terrible loss of life suffered by Palestinians as well as Israelis.
Your complaint appears to be that the DNC didn’t allow promoters of the Palestinian cause to degrade the DNC Convention.
I find it puzzling that this recap on the DNC completely ignored the fact that the DNC allowed an Israeli parent to speak at the convention, while offering no similar opportunity for a Palestinian.
In so doing the DMC was literally communicating that Palestian lives matter less than Israeli lives.
If you hear the support at the DNC for recognizing the plight of Palestians in Gaza you'll realize that the DNC is out of step with its constituents.
Why would you not mention this at all? I know the Bulwark has a strong bias for Israel but this is getting fucking absurd for a media entity that CLAIMS to be committed to just reporting the facts, without bias.
“ n so doing the DMC was literally communicating that Palestian lives matter less than Israeli lives.”
No.
That statement is not a valid criticism.
The “DNC” (not DMC) allowed peaceful demonstrations supporting the Palestinians criticism Re GAZA, and the Israeli couple who spoke to the Convention about the humanitarian crisis referred to the terrible loss of life suffered by Palestinians as well as Israelis.
Your complaint appears to be that the DNC didn’t allow promoters of the Palestinian cause to degrade the DNC Convention.
Expecting the DNC to do that is naive.