I’m glad you’re happy. Enormous damage? In what way? Symbolically to people who disagree with him?
How do you determine one man doing enormous damage?
Define damage.
I don’t have to agree with his actions to understand and accept that he has a right to his values and how he chooses to express them. Just as I don’t have to agree with …
I’m glad you’re happy. Enormous damage? In what way? Symbolically to people who disagree with him?
How do you determine one man doing enormous damage?
Define damage.
I don’t have to agree with his actions to understand and accept that he has a right to his values and how he chooses to express them. Just as I don’t have to agree with your actions, even if they turn out to be inconsequential.
If you disagree with his values, say so. And show how.
If you think he has contradicted himself, be enough of a journalist to point out specifics measured against so acceptable scale.
But to whine he’s hypocrite is, in my opinion, lame and lazy, especially if you don’t qualify or quantify the impact or consequences of his decisions.
I’m glad you’re happy. Enormous damage? In what way? Symbolically to people who disagree with him?
How do you determine one man doing enormous damage?
Define damage.
I don’t have to agree with his actions to understand and accept that he has a right to his values and how he chooses to express them. Just as I don’t have to agree with your actions, even if they turn out to be inconsequential.
If you disagree with his values, say so. And show how.
If you think he has contradicted himself, be enough of a journalist to point out specifics measured against so acceptable scale.
But to whine he’s hypocrite is, in my opinion, lame and lazy, especially if you don’t qualify or quantify the impact or consequences of his decisions.
If you don't think China kowtowing to the CCP repeatedly has damaged human rights in the ways illustrated here and elsewhere, well, okay.
Is that what I said? No. This reply is a distraction, a whole other thread.