I’m honestly lost with what you are arguing here. Are you saying that “democrats could have done x but didn’t” and that is why we are here? Or are you arguing that we would be here anyway? I just don’t see how democrats could have stopped the overturning of roe without winning more presidential elections (2 of which they won the popula…
I’m honestly lost with what you are arguing here. Are you saying that “democrats could have done x but didn’t” and that is why we are here? Or are you arguing that we would be here anyway? I just don’t see how democrats could have stopped the overturning of roe without winning more presidential elections (2 of which they won the popular vote in and one of those was decided by said Supreme Court on a questionable doctrine)
I’m honestly lost with what you are arguing here. Are you saying that “democrats could have done x but didn’t” and that is why we are here? Or are you arguing that we would be here anyway? I just don’t see how democrats could have stopped the overturning of roe without winning more presidential elections (2 of which they won the popular vote in and one of those was decided by said Supreme Court on a questionable doctrine)