I'd favor a rule where nothing became law without 10% of the opposing party's support. Laws aren't meant to be willy-nilly easy. They also are not meant to give one party, minority or majority, totalitarian rule which Mitch essentially has had for 20 years or so.
I'd favor a rule where nothing became law without 10% of the opposing party's support. Laws aren't meant to be willy-nilly easy. They also are not meant to give one party, minority or majority, totalitarian rule which Mitch essentially has had for 20 years or so.
Disagree with this but understand your sentiment. I think the problem is that we don’t do enough. I also think 10% is misleading. If you got to Wyoming senators that would represent like .1% of the population. If you got to California that is >10% of the population. Hard to make the math work with the population
I'd favor a rule where nothing became law without 10% of the opposing party's support. Laws aren't meant to be willy-nilly easy. They also are not meant to give one party, minority or majority, totalitarian rule which Mitch essentially has had for 20 years or so.
Disagree with this but understand your sentiment. I think the problem is that we don’t do enough. I also think 10% is misleading. If you got to Wyoming senators that would represent like .1% of the population. If you got to California that is >10% of the population. Hard to make the math work with the population