Your logical fallacy here is the fallacy of the excluded middle. No one asked you to write a thesis. Your great big assertions alluded to his conduct as host of Wheel of Fortune. THAT conduct is what you should have used for support. You did not do so, and you did not do so in your reply.
None of this is defense of Sajak. I simply object …
Your logical fallacy here is the fallacy of the excluded middle. No one asked you to write a thesis. Your great big assertions alluded to his conduct as host of Wheel of Fortune. THAT conduct is what you should have used for support. You did not do so, and you did not do so in your reply.
None of this is defense of Sajak. I simply object to gratuitous slamming of anyone with nothing behind it. Leave that sort of thing to Trump and MAGA.
Your logical fallacy here is the fallacy of the excluded middle. No one asked you to write a thesis. Your great big assertions alluded to his conduct as host of Wheel of Fortune. THAT conduct is what you should have used for support. You did not do so, and you did not do so in your reply.
None of this is defense of Sajak. I simply object to gratuitous slamming of anyone with nothing behind it. Leave that sort of thing to Trump and MAGA.