Create something, then let the market decide the economics. Some petty whack-a-mole strategy is a futile way to paper over the obvious truth that the entire concept of copyright law has no place in a seamless global community with these tools freely available to all. Human brains already train on this material - no one thinks to stop tha…
Create something, then let the market decide the economics. Some petty whack-a-mole strategy is a futile way to paper over the obvious truth that the entire concept of copyright law has no place in a seamless global community with these tools freely available to all. Human brains already train on this material - no one thinks to stop that. Othering the tool because it possesses a potential is a terrible precedent. Those of us who actually explore that potential - the culminating latent space of human creation - come to understand that we're not so special on any individual scale. This perspective reveals to open minds how much more there is to gain than to be lost by these new tools. Listen to David Lynch on this topic, not the person who paints nothing but the same stylized anthropomorphic dog pictures or whatever & thinks their work is precious.
Respectfully, your stated opinion is the opposite of an “obvious truth.” You seem to be confusing what is possible with what is just. It is possible to destroy the livelihoods of tens of thousands of artists by pretending that they don’t own what they create. But theft is inherently unjust.
Crowbars are “available to all.” Using one to break into someone else’s house and steal their property is still both illegal and immoral.
Create something, then let the market decide the economics. Some petty whack-a-mole strategy is a futile way to paper over the obvious truth that the entire concept of copyright law has no place in a seamless global community with these tools freely available to all. Human brains already train on this material - no one thinks to stop that. Othering the tool because it possesses a potential is a terrible precedent. Those of us who actually explore that potential - the culminating latent space of human creation - come to understand that we're not so special on any individual scale. This perspective reveals to open minds how much more there is to gain than to be lost by these new tools. Listen to David Lynch on this topic, not the person who paints nothing but the same stylized anthropomorphic dog pictures or whatever & thinks their work is precious.
Respectfully, your stated opinion is the opposite of an “obvious truth.” You seem to be confusing what is possible with what is just. It is possible to destroy the livelihoods of tens of thousands of artists by pretending that they don’t own what they create. But theft is inherently unjust.
Crowbars are “available to all.” Using one to break into someone else’s house and steal their property is still both illegal and immoral.