It is not a new strategy. Howard DEan of vermont called it the 50 state strategy. When use correctly and effectively it negates the Republican small state electoral college advantage. The Republicans disadvantage is the popular vote. which is the objective of a 50 state strategy.
Make them compete everywhere ! The more resources they have to spend in small states to defend the less they have to spend in toss up states .
the final part of this strategy is the long game . Promoting Democratic approach in small states will eventually allow for those states to become competitive on a local level . use what walz 's approach has been in Minnesota ., what Brown's approach is in Ohio . and adopt it to other small states and you will have a winning formula .
It is not a new strategy. Howard DEan of vermont called it the 50 state strategy. When use correctly and effectively it negates the Republican small state electoral college advantage. The Republicans disadvantage is the popular vote. which is the objective of a 50 state strategy.
Make them compete everywhere ! The more resources they have to spend in small states to defend the less they have to spend in toss up states .
the final part of this strategy is the long game . Promoting Democratic approach in small states will eventually allow for those states to become competitive on a local level . use what walz 's approach has been in Minnesota ., what Brown's approach is in Ohio . and adopt it to other small states and you will have a winning formula .