Dems should focus on Trump's cognitive decline but have to be careful about "a vote for Trump is a vote for Vance". It's not that it can't be effective b/c his resume is so thin right now. It could work if the public believes Trump won't mentor him to be replacement b/c of his narcissism.
Dems should focus on Trump's cognitive decline but have to be careful about "a vote for Trump is a vote for Vance". It's not that it can't be effective b/c his resume is so thin right now. It could work if the public believes Trump won't mentor him to be replacement b/c of his narcissism.
A vote for Trump is a vote for Vance could work, maybe, if people realize that a vote for Vance is a vote for Nationalist Conservatism. But if theyтАЩve already bought into that agenda (NatCon), then it will only make things worse, not better.
Dems should focus on Trump's cognitive decline but have to be careful about "a vote for Trump is a vote for Vance". It's not that it can't be effective b/c his resume is so thin right now. It could work if the public believes Trump won't mentor him to be replacement b/c of his narcissism.
A vote for Trump is a vote for Vance could work, maybe, if people realize that a vote for Vance is a vote for Nationalist Conservatism. But if theyтАЩve already bought into that agenda (NatCon), then it will only make things worse, not better.
I havenтАЩt seen that frame that a vote for Trump would be a vote for Vance. Trump is scary enough on his own, donтАЩt you think?