---At a pivotal moment in the film, state-captured surveillance video shows a man depositing several ballots into a drop box before getting into a white Ford SUV whose license plate is visible, but blurred by the filmmakers.
“What you are seeing is a crime,” D’Souza says in the film as the video plays. “These are fraudulent votes.”
In fact, investigators say it was not a crime. And those were not fraudulent votes.
Rather, an investigator for the Georgia Board of Elections has determined the man was depositing his own ballots, plus the ballots of his wife and adult children, who are also registered voters. That’s all perfectly legal in Georgia.---
That's just one example. What D'Souza claimed was a crime was investigated and found not to be. So when you say, "Not at all", you appear to be projecting the same false certainty of the guy who made the 'documentary'. Coupled with what appear to be made up numbers in your post that don't tie to the link you provided, I don't see how I can ascribe much credibility to your claims.
When looking at the crosstabs, I do not see where you are getting the 75% number you are claiming.
I also don't know how I am to view the objectiveness of people who paid to see what appears very much to be a slanted political production.
As for debunking: https://www.factcheck.org/2022/06/evidence-gaps-in-2000-mules/
---At a pivotal moment in the film, state-captured surveillance video shows a man depositing several ballots into a drop box before getting into a white Ford SUV whose license plate is visible, but blurred by the filmmakers.
“What you are seeing is a crime,” D’Souza says in the film as the video plays. “These are fraudulent votes.”
In fact, investigators say it was not a crime. And those were not fraudulent votes.
Rather, an investigator for the Georgia Board of Elections has determined the man was depositing his own ballots, plus the ballots of his wife and adult children, who are also registered voters. That’s all perfectly legal in Georgia.---
That's just one example. What D'Souza claimed was a crime was investigated and found not to be. So when you say, "Not at all", you appear to be projecting the same false certainty of the guy who made the 'documentary'. Coupled with what appear to be made up numbers in your post that don't tie to the link you provided, I don't see how I can ascribe much credibility to your claims.