361 Comments
User's avatar
Kotzsu's avatar

Morning routine:

1. Coffee.

2. Read Morning Shots.

3. Swear audibly, under breath.

4. Resume trying to live life amidst the fall of the republic.

Expand full comment
Ashley's avatar

The perfect comment. Exactly how I start my day, too.

Sigh. Grateful for my Bulwark community.

Expand full comment
Sharon Herrick's avatar

Yes, SIGH. Add the huge SIGH. And about 20 other posts including Joyce Vance, Robert Reich, Andy Borowitz, The Contrarian, Ann Telnaes, Liza Donnelly, Ruth Ben-Ghiat and, if I'm lucky, Dave Barry. Grateful for them all.

Expand full comment
Danielle Hawkins Treille's avatar

All your collective sighs amount to your country having become fascist. You can sigh about that one too.

Expand full comment
Duane Pierson's avatar

Trump's executing a rolling coup. A rapid deployment Nat'l Guard unit will be used against blue & purple state & cities and during fed elections. We're beyond dangerous times.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

I think there is a limit to how much of this the Guard will put up with. Not so the newly- minted ICE goons.

Expand full comment
Jeff the Original's avatar

I agree that there has to be some pushback from the National Guard leadership. This may come to light when we have a few national disasters and the funding AND the units are depleted enough to impact the response.

Expand full comment
Christine's avatar

Since neither Trump or Noam thought it was a good idea to send the National Guard into Texas when the Guadalupe river rose 30 feet and drowned over a hundred people, I'm not sure what they consider a "national disaster".

Personally, my national disaster is the administration.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Naw. Any obvious fallout will be Obama’s fault.

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

I wouldn't bet the house concerning pushback from the Guard leadership. That could bring the wrath of Kahn. I could see mumbling among Guardsmen though after serving their deployments.( standing around doing nothing but perhaps picking up some trash) You know Trumpster: beautify Blue cities while fighting crime!

Expand full comment
Jeff the Original's avatar

Public pushback for sure....private pushback in the form of something like..."We're going to get some really bad headlines when we can't do our normal jobs because of all of these special commitments."

This message being communicated (and massaged) up the chain of command shouldn't garner too much angst if it's perceived as trying to help the administration avoid some bad PR.

Expand full comment
Duane Pierson's avatar

I suppose it depends upon how much pro-Prez Bonespurs filtering is done to create this rapid response Guard unit. Then, like you say, there's the unfiltered Guard, especially in non-red ststes.

But, ICE, like you say, is totally in the bag.

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

Like DOJ. And FBI is getting there.

Expand full comment
Kevin P's avatar

a recent anecdotal data-point, National Guard reenlistments have dropped by well below the normal rate for the last few months..

Expand full comment
JM's avatar

Sadly, I expect there to be a Kent State. In fact, WTMJ was playing the CSN song Ohio as bumper music. With untrained National Guard for this type of long term activation and carrying weapons.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

What if one day soon there appeared banners across the gates of every national guard armory in the country? "Remember Your Oath."

Expand full comment
Allenby's avatar

If there are any defectors from Trumpism in the Guard leadership (you know, leaders that respect their oaths and the constitution), then they might as well lay low until next November, lest they be removed and replaced by a trout before the critical juncture.

Expand full comment
jpg's avatar
Aug 26Edited

Add: Gasp at most recent move to nationalize a private company to the complete silence of the GOP.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

Control of business is at the heart of fascism.

Expand full comment
orbit's avatar

MAGA are plenty vocal about socialism.

Their lord and savior does it?

Wind-rustled leaves are louder...

Expand full comment
Carol S.'s avatar

To be fair, nationalizing a private company to serve the interests of the president is not the same as redistributionist policies intended to uplift the poor.

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

And the sound of crickets are deafening.

Expand full comment
Danielle Hawkins Treille's avatar

Gasps and sighs... There you have it, Americans prove they have no backbone.

Expand full comment
Justin Lee's avatar

Throw in a dog walk and refilling an embarrassingly high number of bird feeders, and I'm with you.

Expand full comment
Steve Beckwith's avatar

I usually throw in a little shouting into the abyss.

Expand full comment
Linda Oliver's avatar

I begin my day with the day’s Mass Bible reading to fortify myself against the day’s coming indignities. Thus braced, I follow your routine. During the day, I periodically shake my head in disbelief, also. Long live the Bulwark Community!

Expand full comment
Jeff the Original's avatar

5. (for me) Lament that so many of my fellow military retirees whom I served with are still cheering Trump and all of this BS on.

Expand full comment
Sumi Ink 🇨🇦's avatar

Just how stupid are they? Never mind, rhetorical question

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

"Let me count the ways".

Expand full comment
Cathy G's avatar

Unfortunately, the military isn’t immune to stupidity. You would think active and retired military would have a better understanding of our constitution than the average person given their oath to defend. Fortunately, the military also has people like yourself - thank you.

Expand full comment
GA Westover's avatar

I reread the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire during Trump I. Just to try and understand how people made it through the day was their once proud civilization descended into anarchy and chaos. Now looking for a suitable classic for Trump: The Return of the Stupid.

Expand full comment
Pat Dumond's avatar

My morning routine differs only slightly.

1) Hearthstone and Diet Coke

2) Read all unread Bulwark posts.

3) Swear loudly. 4) Cry.

5) Wonder why I had to live through the fall of the republic. I don't even know if I'm actively trying to live with it.

Expand full comment
Oldandintheway's avatar

I'm afraid we all have to do more than that. Even if you only give some money to support organizations such as the ACLU or refugee assistance, DO SOMETHING to combat what we are seeing every day. Even $5 a month in three places matters

If you don't want to just do $$, find candidates who are strongly in opposition to this madness, and who are working in their states or communities. Anne Anderson is running against Lindsey Graham in SC. She is a great candidate. JoAnna Mendoza in AZ-6 os running with other Hellcat Democratic women to help flip the House.

Join Sister District, and help make sure the election THIS November in VA goes Blue!

Expand full comment
Danielle Hawkins Treille's avatar

Right you are: sighs, gasps, Bible reading.... seriously? That's it when you are witnessing your country descending into fascism? Now wonder it was so easy.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

My first act in the morning is involuntary: 1) entire digestive system clenches in distress. Then I follow yours.

Expand full comment
Claudia Allred's avatar

I rise earlier than Morning Shots. HCR always 1st! Then Borowitz and finally, at last! MORNING SHOTS! Then onto #4.😡🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

I read HCR first as well. HCR is a great summary of the previous day. I was even able to get some of my Trump supporting family to read it daily because she does a pretty good job keeping her "leftist" comments out of it and making it matter of fact - especially with her supporting sources.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

I like that she brings receipts--links to her sources.

Expand full comment
Kate Fall's avatar

So true! I add step 0.5: Shake off last night's nightmares about the collapse of civilization.

Expand full comment
Richard Kane's avatar

As do I!

Expand full comment
JT AK Dude's avatar

yup...hard to crawl out of bed....but sometimes something comes along that just makes my day.

https://youtu.be/GChC0fDW4bs?feature=shared

Troll them mercilessly!!! I'll be using the term "Epsteiner", somewhat "liberally".

Expand full comment
Sharon L Genung's avatar

Yep, me too.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar
Aug 26Edited

This morning I ordered up a deep dive on Lisa Cook from Chat GPT. She is an expert in economics and history: e.g. banking in Russia. Also, among other interesting facts, I found this, as summarized by the program:

"Lisa D. Cook’s scholarship is deeply and specifically connected to the lynching database efforts: She helped critique, refine, and extend data quality in academic discussions on lynching. She applied those refined datasets to quantify the economic impact of racial terror, especially on Black innovation. And she explored the structural relationship between segregation and lynching, enriching how we understand the spatial — and societal — drivers of racial violence."

Her sin might be bringing to light aspects of American history not deemed "bright" by the White House

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Thank you for the detailed information, but I think you give "the White House" too much credit for research and connecting dots. She is a woman of color who talks back to and opposes the Felon. What else does he need?

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar
Aug 26Edited

As on "The Apprentice," Trump is not making the decisions. My bet is that there is an anti-woke desk at the Heritage Foundation--Kevin Roberts himself?

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

I think all he needs to do the deep, evil thinking is Stephen Miller and Russell Vought whispering in his ear. Trump then does the thing he likes the most- hurting people.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

All you need is to oppose the 🍊clown.

Expand full comment
Janine Bennette's avatar

Yes I doubt anyone has in the WH has read that much. They just know that she’s black and therefore the one that these schoolyard bullies and mafiosi prefer to make an example of. They are really very base.

Expand full comment
Oregon Larry's avatar

This all CAN'T have anything to do with the fact that she's: Black while being a woman? Can it? I think I'm seeing a pattern.

Expand full comment
Lynn  Bentson's avatar

It's a new offense : being an economist while black . Like driving while black ., but more uppity.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

An interesting finding: the incidence of lynching in the South bore an inverse relation to the price of cotton. Who knew?

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I recently gave my son a good laugh about how ChatGPT is so personal I seldom use it because I feel like I’m disturbing it with my frivolous queries.

Expand full comment
Patricia Lestz's avatar

Great description. I hate chat gp. It has never worked for me. Occasionally it will get me a person which is not what is trying to be accomplished. The goal frustrate the people so that they just because complacent with everything.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

I don’t use it either.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

One time, several Chat iterations ago, I asked whatever became of Hannibal's elephants--do we know where their bones are located? Chat told me it was a bit of a silly question. Other than that, it does not have eyes to roll, so... .

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Haha! My son (the data scientist) has a scenario where AI eliminates anyone with imperfectly composed or frivolous queries.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar
Aug 26Edited

These days I start general, then go specific. The point is to not let on a point of view in advance. E.g. 1) Punic Wars; 2) other Rome/Carthage stuff; 3) the elephants,

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Your grasp of history is waaay beyond mine! But thanks for the tip. My own queries are mostly along the lines of “Are cougars attracted to fish fertilizer?” after my robust garden fence was brought down after an application of pungent, revolting fish fertilizer. ChatGPT has retained that detail about my life, as revealed in future queries - which has added to my caution in what I ask. It’s mildly worried about my safety, and I don’t find that comforting.

Expand full comment
Linda Oliver's avatar

She sounds extremely bright, but I suspect she has 2 sins: being black and not Trump-obedient.

Expand full comment
RedRover's avatar

Brad DeLong makes the case that Cook is the Fed governor MOST inclined to raise interest rates in this environment and threatening her has made them go up. https://open.substack.com/pub/braddelong/p/chaos-moneys-trying-to-fire-fed-governor?r=zh6q&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

Trump wants the adrenaline injected directly into the heart of a reeling economy in 2009 to be mainlined.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

“So the National Guard is being slowly—or not so slowly—turned into the president’s own rapid domestic deployment force, to be used at his unchecked discretion. Its deployment, regardless of the wishes of local authorities or any real showing of emergency, was once presented as exceptional in the cases of Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Now, it is to become the rule.”

Has it dawned on anyone that we are spending a million a day to utilize the National Guard in DC; that’s four times the amount it would cost to house DC’s entire homeless population. Let that sink in!

Additionally, the cost of sending the military and utilizing the National Guard in Los Angeles in June cost over $135 million.

Bottom line: Mr. Law and Order is spending us into oblivion, and accomplishing absolutely nothing in the process, except to invoke fear and normalize a military presence throughout the US when he decides to call a manufactured National Emergency!

And mark my words, by starving FEMA and cutting funds for child after school programs and other beneficial programs to reduce crime, he’s creating problems of his own making, and then will claim he needs to deploy troops to stave off the riots and crime.

It’s a self fulfilling prophecy; igniting the flames for more control over our lives. And sadly, these republicans who always rail about states rights are all on board. It just reminds us how depraved and diabolical these MAGA republicans are; they have no shame or honor; whatsoever! IMHO..:)

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

I believe it's safe to say that Trump loves the show of force and the anguish and anger it provokes. He could care less about the homeless; that's their problem. I sure am glad we were stupid enough to elect this Republican President for a second time.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

That’s Trump’s only job; basically to execute pain and despair. The mechanics behind the process is the job of Project 2025.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Agreed, exactly my point. If he wanted to solve problems he could do it the right way. Instead, he kills programs meant to help reduce crime, and instead dispenses biblical justice just to prove a point; that he can!

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Apparently "biblical justice" is the only thing he ever learned from the Bible.

Expand full comment
dcicero's avatar

Some good points ... that ought to be made by some Democrat somewhere.

Anyone think any of them will do so? I don't.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Thank you. And you’re right, they probably will not at the federal level, but the governor’s and mayor’s are starting to use statistics well and finding an ability to reach the people that matter: voters!

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

It used to be a popular saying, even among Republicans, that ‘states are incubators of democracy’. Now the MAGAs view is ‘states are incubators for federal fascism dominance’

Expand full comment
Kate Fall's avatar

I liked this comment, but then I realized Chris Murphy, among others, is out there saying this almost daily. I think a better question is, who is amplifying what Democrats say so people can hear it?

Expand full comment
Patricia Lestz's avatar

Certainly not the press. MSNBC, NPR and occasionally CNN

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

The MSM doesn’t give the Dems much time.

Expand full comment
Don Gates's avatar

What Trump heard: Sir, you're the greatest POTUS of my lifetime.

What Wes Moore actually said: Sir, you're the greatest POS of my lifetime.

The Abrego Garcia saga is both absurd and outrageously cruel. They will not leave this man alone, all because of an initial fuck up on their part that started this whole thing. People who screw up and are not sociopaths move on; people who are doing what these people are doing are definitely sadistic sociopaths. And people who vote for sadistic sociopaths have issues of their own.

And just out of nowhere, making an issue out of flag burning, something no one has really thought about in 30 years because it was litigated and it's so obviously an exercise of Free Speech. See, the MAGAts have forgotten about Trumpflation already!

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Not to mention the Epstein Files. At least that will be a short news flash next week when the House has to take it up because Milquetoast Mike can't send everyone home again.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

And I think a group of Epstein victims have scheduled a press event early in September.

Expand full comment
Kate Fall's avatar

Virginia Guiffre's memoir comes out in October. This isn't going away.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Yes, unless her family succeeds in delaying it so it can include the domestic abuse she suffered, but hid. Either way, they accomplishing highlighting that situation.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Good to know, thanks. Any more information where or sponsored by whom/what organization?

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I just looked it up: September 3, in Capital Hill. I think it’s organized by their lawyers.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

THANK YOU. 🥂

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

In authoritarian regimes, Dear Leader is never wrong, and neither are his shameless minions.

According to Dear Leader he is the most popular he’s ever been. Inflation is low. Food prices are the lowest in decades. And in just one day, his DC National Guard brought the crime rate in DC to Zero…Zilch….Nada!

Any questions? Happy times! 🤪

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Yes, who is his analyst and what has the Felon been taking? Or is this the evidence we have needed for verification of the expected mental decline that follows a diet coke and double cheese-burger regularly with no exercise?

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Most likely Stephen Miller; with misleading poll numbers from the Gateway Pundit, and economic statistics from Brietbart. A recipe for disaster!…:)

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

When it comes from Miller, misleading poll numbers is a redundancy, aided and abetted by Gateway Pundit and Breitbart.

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

No. I want to know what drugs his analyst is taking. And can I get some to get me through the next three years?

Expand full comment
jpg's avatar

The worst sin is to publicly reveal MAGA incompetence.

Expand full comment
Different drummer's avatar

I can't believe you used the description "sadistic sociopath:" I was thinking after reading MS that one word I haven't heard applied to T is "sadistic" but he very much is. The next thought was, "He is a sadistic sociopath" (in additional to megalomaniac, world's most prolific liar, etc.).

Expand full comment
Don Gates's avatar

I don't know if it's true that great minds think alike, but let's say it is.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Trump is vying to topple Supreme Sadist Stephen Miller.

Expand full comment
Lynn  Bentson's avatar

MIller will rot in hell , because the flames of hell cant consume his cold heart. I saw Newsom's troll for Millers birthday . Look it up , and it should cheer you a little .

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Oh, thanks for that! Miller is almost too close to a cartoon villain to be real. His daily life is like a satire on evil.

Expand full comment
Sumeeta's avatar

You might be interested in Timothy Snyder's analysis of Trump's politics as "sadopopulism":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOjJtEkKMX4

https://snyder.substack.com/p/class-war-or-culture-war

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Have MAGA Americans suffered a complete collapse of their BS alarms? How do statements like that, or the hat - “TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING” - not cause them mortal cringe?

Expand full comment
dwcoyle's avatar

Flag burning is offensive- disruptive- challenging- which is the purpose.

Imagine, for reciprocity, the inundation of displays of the flag on a pole,

tricolored bunting, lapel pins, cufflinks, football jerseys, -- by those who

brashly display their purported patriotism with the symbol- claimed as

their own, for their purposes- -- and proudly proceed to threaten to

arrest, charge, try- punish- jail- those who reverse the symbology for

effect. Irony, wherefore art thou? The loudest objectors seem to be the

most offensive abusers of the symbol. Bonespurs dodging?

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

At a conservative convention several years ago they displayed a golden statue of Trump wearing flag boxers. But that’s not offensive to them.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Actually Don, I think Moore meant greatest POTUS ever: Piece of Turd & Urine Squalor!….:)

Expand full comment
Eva Seifert's avatar

I use POS all the time for President Orange Snake.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

Fair enough, just thought the new Acronym for POTUS was worth a shot…:)

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

But people will say you are demeaning the office of the presidency, rather than holding up a mirror to what is actually happening.

Expand full comment
Robert Jaffee's avatar

True; however, I couldn’t possibly demean the office of the presidency anymore than the charlatan pretending to be president; already has!

The world doesn’t respect us anymore, and neither do the majority of Americans, including myself; so there’s that!…:)

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

Republicans scream about Newsome and how can he speak about the President like that in one breath, and demean Biden still to this day, but not one word about the foul mouthed would be king in the WH.

Expand full comment
Don Gates's avatar

Well done, Governor Moore!

Expand full comment
Ashley's avatar

The media, specifically the reporters in the Oval Office, are failing this nation in spectacular ways. They just all stand there with no pushback of any kind while he lies with reckless abandon. Not a single question about his hand bruise after he forgot his spackle yesterday?

COME ON PRESS CORPS.

Expand full comment
MAP's avatar

They are the worst. They love the attention. Though he's replaced a number of "reputable" outlets with members of the propaganda establishment, there are still enough to push back if they wanted to. The NYT, Wapo—they are Pravda.

Expand full comment
Eva Seifert's avatar

Aren't the members of the press corps silenced by the POS not calling/acknowledging them in favor of Fox, Newsmax and so-called news media (that aren't) that are his best buds?

Expand full comment
Ashley's avatar

I feel like sure he only calls on the ones who are sycophants, but are they incapable of raising their voices and shouting their questions anyway? I sure remember a lot of shouted questions when Biden was president.

Expand full comment
Linda Oliver's avatar

Biden didn’t have contempt for everyone in the room.

Expand full comment
Carol S.'s avatar

And Trump still thinks "the media" are too mean to him - as do his defenders.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar
Aug 26Edited

The deep dive press corps have been purged. Is Kaitlin Collin’s still allowed in? My only exposure is the humorist Lisandra who does a cutting satire of Karoline Leavitt. (I’ve noticed some possible clap back at how other “lefty” journalists pronounce her name as “Carolyn”. Is it a response to the relentless “Kamála”?)

Expand full comment
Sumi Ink 🇨🇦's avatar

The media let Trump destroy truth way back during his first term and especially on and after 01/06/2021. Now Trump dances on truth’s grave, and the media has joined him.

Expand full comment
Alondra's avatar

Let's just call him Dick Tater. You know, for the laughs?

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Who is going to be the first to AI a quick meme of Dick Tater as a real 'tater with a bleached blond comb-over.

Expand full comment
jpg's avatar

I’m visualizing a tater tot.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Come on, you can think bigger. That's just small potatoes.

Expand full comment
Weswolf's avatar

Or, as Redditors would say, a traitor tot.

Expand full comment
Sumeeta's avatar

Add a diaper plus the comb-over and call it Dick Tater Tot

Expand full comment
Linda Oliver's avatar

That sounds funny, but I worry that making such a joke of it could stop people from seeing it as the bad thing and real danger it is.

Expand full comment
RAB's avatar

The way they grovel at the feet of Trump and his new gf Karolyin is shameful and pathetic

Expand full comment
JF's avatar
Aug 26Edited

Does that mean we are “Dick Tater Haters”?

You gave me my first good laugh of the day, Alondra!

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

I know we are making fun of the word, but, given the size it is reliably reported to be, shouldn't the name really be "Dickie"?

And I just wish one of us would come up with an appropriate middle name beginning with a "J", so that we could truthfully refer this clown as DJT.

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

Jerkie?

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Not a real name, but it made me think of "Jackie".😏

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Too bad Jaundiced is yellow and not orange

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Actually, it can also mean bitter and resentful

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I like it! Dickie. That’s the informal. As to J . . . I think we should look for a medical term that fits, like “Jaundiced”. Maybe there’s worse to be found, something that implies pus. Too bad “suppurating” doesn’t start with J.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

If you don't care for "Jackie", how about "Jack-o"....

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Uh oh . . . Nothing that might attract CHILDREN.

Expand full comment
Lynn  Bentson's avatar

I'd love to see him dressed as. PRes. Tater at a press conference . He would never notice it , and Karoline certainly wouldn't get it .

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

I'm thinking of an infinite regress, like on the Quaker Oats box: A Dick Tater *with^ a dick tater, with a dick tater...and so on... .

Expand full comment
Marvin Brooklyn's avatar

I recently noticed that Trump has not been wearing a MAGA hat. Instead he has one that says Trump is (or was) always right about everything. That takes his narcissism to another level and removes the lie that he cares about the country. He only cares about himself, his wealth and his power.

Expand full comment
Carol S.'s avatar

His extreme selfishness was obvious to me from the beginning. It's been baffling to watch so many people - some of them highly educated and not stupid - insist that he is motivated by a deep and pure patriotism and morality, and that he cares more about average Americans than all his critics do.

Expand full comment
Marvin Brooklyn's avatar

After the 2016 election (either before or just after he took office) Trump hosted a dinner for members of the press. An article about the dinner included a description of the menu and a comment that indirectly summed up who Trump is. All those in attendance were given ONE scoop of vanilla ice cream. Trump, the host, got TWO scoops! I don't think that there is any culture in the world in which it is considered proper for a host to get more dessert (or anything else) thanks/her guests.

Expand full comment
Lynn  Bentson's avatar

Ive never met a t***p voter , who did not say "its for the tax cuts and nothing else matters " who was educated .

Expand full comment
Mandy rose's avatar

Absolutely chilling. Thank you for continuing to faithfully report on the downfall of our democracy.

I'll say I'm especially concerned that the executive order also "directs Stephen Miller to create an online portal for 'Americans with law enforcement or other relevant backgrounds and experience' to apply to join federal agents in enforcing Mr. Trump’s 'crime emergency' order in the District of Columbia." (Quoted from the New York Times.)

Can we talk about this? Am I reading correctly that anyone with apparently any type (or apparently no type) of law enforcement experience is also being recruited for this effort? Is this what The Proud Boys have been "standing by" for? I'm honestly terrified.

Expand full comment
Sandra W Christie's avatar

Agreed. I translated that to "Anybody with a grudge come one in! He're your mask and weapon. Have fun!"

It sounds like “Now, if you had one really violent day … one rough hour, and I mean real rough. The word will get out and it will end immediately.” Trump - September 29, 2024

Expand full comment
Sheri Smith's avatar

I hope Trump’s words come back to haunt him.

Expand full comment
Sandra W Christie's avatar

I fear those words will come back to haunt us. That one "really violent day" may be coming, and not just for a day. It has always been what he wanted.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Yes, thank you; we need to discuss this. Along with the new unsurprising report that DOGE bros have compromised all our Social Security data.

Expand full comment
Bill Martin's avatar

How about burning TRUMP flags instead?

Expand full comment
Don Gates's avatar

That's ten years.

Expand full comment
Linda Oliver's avatar

Now that I could get behind.

Expand full comment
Carol Gamm's avatar

Homeless people in the DC area? Trump’s answer: Lay off more government employees!!! That will fix it. Then we can give even more money to those billionaires living in guarded compounds.

Expand full comment
Paul Brady's avatar

What exactly are they doing with those homeless people? Put in shelters? Given apartments? Put in concentration camps? Or just pushed out of the immediate area so that they can be homeless somewhere else?

Expand full comment
Carole Langston's avatar

That's what I've been asking. Where are they after being hauled off and their possessions destroyed?

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I think they have landed in jail, which is a very expensive form of housing.

Expand full comment
Carol Gamm's avatar

Thank you. So sad to destroy our own people.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

They're not "HIS" people. They did not vote for him and he knows that because you can't vote if you don't have an address. The perfect victims.

Martin Niemöller, modified: First they came for the homeless, and I did not say anything because I was not homeless. Then they came for the jobless, and I did not say anything because (at the time) I was not jobless....

Expand full comment
MAP's avatar

I believe jail was mentioned.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

More expensive than a suite at the Hilton.

Expand full comment
Keith Wresch's avatar

So in other words the concentration camp option. Should anyone really be surprised?

Expand full comment
Kate Fall's avatar

That's what we've been doing for the last 40 years. Trump is just doing it faster, and possibly with international flights.

Expand full comment
Jeff Leitch's avatar

Some of them have crossed the river into Arlington, VA.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

An image of George Washington in the prow appeared unbidden in my mind. So similar.

Expand full comment
Keith Wresch's avatar

Well I do believe Mount Vernon would have the space for them.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

In the olden days, that would be the slave quarters . . .

RFK wants to put them to work on organic farms.

Expand full comment
Keith Wresch's avatar

Slave quarters or homeless quarters, I’m sure it’s all the same to Trump and RFK jr.

Expand full comment
Frau Katze's avatar

Good question. This came up in comments at a WSJ article. The MAGAs were crowing “The left loves crime and homelessness.” I kept asking “What’s he doing with the homeless?” No one answered.

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

Right now, Donald Trump knows he can do anything and everything he wants. And why wouldn't he? He has a silent Congress that will back everything he wants. He has a backstop guard rail SCOTUS that will find any reason possible to support him. They gave him immunity for everything he did as President. They gutted Amendment 14, Article 3 so he could run again. This isn't going to change. Think it is illegal to fire a Federal Reserve Board member? SCOTUS will get around that. Judge Paula Innes has ruled Garcia absolutely can't be deported to Uganda. SCOTUS will say Trump can do that when it is appealed. Think National Guard in cities is illegal. SCOTUS will say it is legal. As JVL says: "Good luck America".

Expand full comment
Warden Gulley's avatar

"A solemn mockery of the US Constitution". Judge Boasberg says it well. As does Governor Pritzker in his delivery yesterday. The DC Dictator plans of subjugation will spread across the nation as he enacts the concerns expressed by George Washington warning about factionalism in his Farewell Address.

“It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”

“However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely . . . to become potent engines by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

“The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of public liberty.”

That is where we are today. George told us. In 1796.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Excellent. But too many big words and long thoughts for today’s Americans. Can it fit on a hat?

Expand full comment
Anna Livia's avatar

Maybe “Washington Warned Us” ?

Expand full comment
Warden Gulley's avatar

"George Told Us"? I agree. Washington's Farewell Address contains too many words to fit on a hat. But the concept may not travel well unless people know and understand the thrust of Washinton's argument. Out of context it is just another meaningless hat slogan. "Just who is George? Is he an influencer?" The public has neither the patience nor the comprehension to engage in anything beyond TikTok scrolling during which they can't even complete a whole TikTok video before losing interest and scrolling to the next maximally engaging experience. Which lasts 30 seconds. I guess that is where we are today.

Expand full comment
Robert J Danolfo's avatar

Andrew, Bill and Jim, Thanks for the recap on yesterday's declarations from the mount. The Dictatorship began when the last of the axis of evil among Hegseth, Bondi and Patel was confirmed. Now we can't blame Trump because that would be like blaming a child for ravishing a fresh made cookie from the cookie jar. The Senate Republicans were the true architects of this government coup and should be reminded of this fact every day of their lives. While we're at it, we should tell the American people who the real traitors are. I think those Republicans actually know this because you haven't heard a word from them. To them, silence is golden.

Expand full comment
MAP's avatar
Aug 26Edited

I disagree. They are partially responsible, but the main villains are the 5 (oops, make that 6) toadies on SCOTUS. They ignored the 14th amendment; interfered in states' rights on who could and could not be on the ballot, and gave him virtually unfettered powers. They are also rubber stamping his dismantling of the fed govt and abrogation of due process. They give him everything he wants and support every executive order, both through the regular process and the shadow docket, where these days, they rule for him and don't even bother to share their legal reasoning—most likely because there isn't any.

But when Joe Biden tried to cancel student debt, it was overreach.

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

And now, if you join ICE you get student loan forgiveness. Can’t make this stuff up.

Expand full comment
RAB's avatar

It takes a village to raze a democracy.

Expand full comment
Sheri Smith's avatar

But Trump is absolutely to blame as well.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I hope at least a few GOP toadies are keeping a journal for future publication so we can perform a post-mortem on their souls. I am truly curious. Unfortunately my own mortality is in a race against theirs. I need to follow the Mediterranean diet. Or has that been renamed the “RFKJr Super American Diet”?

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Since my brain is somewhat normal, I have a hard time understanding our Republican Senator's thinking. It's like they just gave up their power and are fading into the background. Is there any chance that they see the writing on the wall and are scared shitless to cause problems - basically fearing they may be defenestrated should Trump become the world's new despot?

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I’m guessing that’s likely. Other than a few loud mouths, the MAGA/GOP are being fairly quietly supine. You’d expect some crowing from true believers, and it’s only a few doing that, or so it seems to me. I admit that I try to ignore them as a group, so my observations lack scientific rigor!

Expand full comment
Kathe Rich's avatar

But it's perfectly fine to sign a flag with a Sharpie, or fashion it into a hat or a coat. With no logic or explanation, just whatever the Dear Leader says. SCOTUS will go along with it, because as Justice Luttig said, we can't count on them to rule for our Democracy.

Expand full comment
Kate Fall's avatar

Oh mannnn, I'm going to go on a rant I've been holding in for years:

Those black and white flags with one blue stripe or one red stripe are an abomination. You want to secede? The Red, White, and Blue isn't good enough for you? Move. To. Russia.

Sorry, I've been holding that back for a while.

Expand full comment
Jeff the Original's avatar

Or dry hump it...

Expand full comment
JF's avatar
Aug 26Edited

Those videos need to be part of any campaign . . . Oh wait. Campaigning is so “last year”.

Expand full comment
James F.'s avatar

Adam Levitin had a good take on the whole "mortgage fraud" thing - Bill Pulte is clearly abusing his power on behalf of Trump. How convenient that a whole bunch of Donald Trump's enemies are all of a sudden having their loan/mortgage documents examined at the same time! It's likely that Pulte is just looking at anyone who is a Democrat and going through their loan applications, even if they were from years ago and there's no pertinent reason to look at them now aside from digging for potential dirt (article is here: https://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2025/08/bill-pultes-enemys-list.html)

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

In Paxton’s divorce which is wending its way through the Texas courts. His soon to be ex wife testified that that was what her husband did a few years ago.

Expand full comment
Lynn  Bentson's avatar

But no one in Texas will prosecute him , even though she apparently has the receipts on rentals he purchased fraudulently in widely separated cities .

Expand full comment
Katherine B Barz's avatar

Yes Lynn. But it will not play well in the case against Cook. Can’t wait for this to be on SNL.

Expand full comment
Steve Beckwith's avatar

This crew stopped being a legitimate presidential administration sometime in January, soon after inauguration. I will only refer to it as The Regime, which it is. We do not have a legitimate president at this time. I further find it blood-curdling that the Secret Service (SS) is now stopping peaceful protest by way of enforcing local law. The SS stopped Ben Wittes from a chalking a Ukrainian flag on the sidewalk in protest of the Alaska thing in front of the Russian embassy weekend before last.

Expand full comment
Jeff the Original's avatar

I can't remember the gentleman's name, but he's the scholar who always wears a bow tie when he's a guest on talk shows. Pretty sure he was a law professor at an ivy league school. Anyway, he did a recent video (while hiking/walking) where he mentioned that Trump has dismantled 250 years of our nation's attempt to build a "more perfect union" in about 6 months.

His words struck me about how frail life is and how quickly things can change despite how many years it took to build them. It also struck me of how many of my acquaintances have no clue of this concept, it's impact nor do they want to learn about it.

Expand full comment
Steve Beckwith's avatar

That sounds like John Flannery. He has a channel where he does daily "walk and talks" and starts each one with relating Thomas Jefferson's take on the weather. He's a great American. There are some regulars to his chan who sometimes call themselves "The Dirt Road Gang"...kind of like The Greek Chorus. About the substance of your comment; yeah, it's truly surreal.

Expand full comment
Jeff the Original's avatar

Bingo! That's him. Thanks for the tips on how to hear/see him more regularly.

Expand full comment