2 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jul 11, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Paul K. Ogden's avatar

Please. SCOTUS is not "now targeting contraception." ONE out of NINE justices mentioned revisiting Griswald v. Connecticut in a concurring opinion which no other justice joined. Even then if Griswald was reversed, the issue would simply go back to the states and how many states would pass a law banning contraception? I'm guessing none.

Expand full comment