No, they did much worse than that.
They - for all intents and purposes - said the Ohio doctor was lying.
"It's was single sourced! There's no report available to the public! It must not be true!"
The ONLY logical conclusion from that line of thinking is that the doctor WHO WAS QUOTED/SOURCED was lying.
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
No, they did much worse than that.
They - for all intents and purposes - said the Ohio doctor was lying.
"It's was single sourced! There's no report available to the public! It must not be true!"
The ONLY logical conclusion from that line of thinking is that the doctor WHO WAS QUOTED/SOURCED was lying.