As a naturalized citizen he is not eligible to be on any ballots for President. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Unlike the ‘debate’ about Cruz, McCain, George Romney, or Harris, this is absolutely clear. If a state were to include him (unlikely), a lawsuit to remove him would be successful.
As a naturalized citizen he is not eligible to be on any ballots for President. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Unlike the ‘debate’ about Cruz, McCain, George Romney, or Harris, this is absolutely clear. If a state were to include him (unlikely), a lawsuit to remove him would be successful.
A lawsuit? Really? How long will that take? I like your 'it's unconstitutional' stance, but that seems a bit optimistic, again you are counting on people to do the right thing, there isn't any Constitution Police Force.
As a naturalized citizen he is not eligible to be on any ballots for President. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Unlike the ‘debate’ about Cruz, McCain, George Romney, or Harris, this is absolutely clear. If a state were to include him (unlikely), a lawsuit to remove him would be successful.
A lawsuit? Really? How long will that take? I like your 'it's unconstitutional' stance, but that seems a bit optimistic, again you are counting on people to do the right thing, there isn't any Constitution Police Force.
It wouldn’t take that long. A election lawsuit gets priority, especially when it involves names on a ballot.
Well. That's hopeful. But a lot of 'that could never happen' has happened recently, so I'm unsure how solid the 'that could never happen' ground is.