About Stormy's salacious testimony, well, I have negative interest in the details of her brief encounter with Trump. Disgusting. However! I think if I were a juror, heaven forbid, one question I would have is, did the alleged encounter really occur? And I think that giving so many details bolsters her claim that, yes, the encounter reall…
About Stormy's salacious testimony, well, I have negative interest in the details of her brief encounter with Trump. Disgusting. However! I think if I were a juror, heaven forbid, one question I would have is, did the alleged encounter really occur? And I think that giving so many details bolsters her claim that, yes, the encounter really did occur. I know that is not the crux of the case - adultery is not a crime - but if the encounter really occurred, Trump has an obvious reason to want to shut her up. Also, he has been accusing her of being a liar ever since the story broke, so I wonder whether some of her performance had to do with her own pride in saying, no, I am not a liar; here are all these details to prove it! I have heard she stood up very well in cross, out thought and outfoxed the defense.
About Stormy's salacious testimony, well, I have negative interest in the details of her brief encounter with Trump. Disgusting. However! I think if I were a juror, heaven forbid, one question I would have is, did the alleged encounter really occur? And I think that giving so many details bolsters her claim that, yes, the encounter really did occur. I know that is not the crux of the case - adultery is not a crime - but if the encounter really occurred, Trump has an obvious reason to want to shut her up. Also, he has been accusing her of being a liar ever since the story broke, so I wonder whether some of her performance had to do with her own pride in saying, no, I am not a liar; here are all these details to prove it! I have heard she stood up very well in cross, out thought and outfoxed the defense.