There are a lot of folks at the DOJ doing yeomen's work! It is the people at the top who are the problem imho. Always, it is those at the top, in charge.
Do I think jurors empaneled to try a murder case are biased against the concept of murder? I hope so. That's wildly different from bias against an individual indicted for murder prior to his, her, or their trial.
Yes, I did - and do. If or when individuals are charged with sedition or conspiracy or treason, those prosecuting will have to meet standards of proof, the judge or judges apply the law, and the jury or juries will have to rule.
If you ask me to recant, I must cite Martin Luther (1521) as precedent.
There are a lot of folks at the DOJ doing yeomen's work! It is the people at the top who are the problem imho. Always, it is those at the top, in charge.
Do I think jurors empaneled to try a murder case are biased against the concept of murder? I hope so. That's wildly different from bias against an individual indicted for murder prior to his, her, or their trial.
Yes, I did - and do. If or when individuals are charged with sedition or conspiracy or treason, those prosecuting will have to meet standards of proof, the judge or judges apply the law, and the jury or juries will have to rule.
If you ask me to recant, I must cite Martin Luther (1521) as precedent.