Come on Kim. This is just being argumentative. The king has no role in government. None. In fact he is not allowed to really comment on anything to do with governing
Come on Kim. This is just being argumentative. The king has no role in government. None. In fact he is not allowed to really comment on anything to do with governing
The comparison was England to Israel. There is nothing remotely similar between the two countries now. There is no country like Israel. ItтАЩs unique because it is (1) a ethnostate and (2) is a democracy. To some extent EVERY country has been thinning you look historically. It is closer to South Africa in 80s and the US before the civil war. ThatтАЩs why it breaks everyoneтАЩs brains.
Most countries in Europe were exactly this as well in the 1600s - 1800s. They solved it the same way we did. Wars and ethnic cleansing.
Come on Kim. This is just being argumentative. The king has no role in government. None. In fact he is not allowed to really comment on anything to do with governing
Ok. I donтАЩt know what the argument is. I said England wasnтАЩt a Christian country. Go far enough back and it didnтАЩt start out one, either.
The comparison was England to Israel. There is nothing remotely similar between the two countries now. There is no country like Israel. ItтАЩs unique because it is (1) a ethnostate and (2) is a democracy. To some extent EVERY country has been thinning you look historically. It is closer to South Africa in 80s and the US before the civil war. ThatтАЩs why it breaks everyoneтАЩs brains.
Most countries in Europe were exactly this as well in the 1600s - 1800s. They solved it the same way we did. Wars and ethnic cleansing.
Oh, sorry. I was just responding to the discussion of whether England was a Christian state. My responses on Israel are higher up in another thread.