The Bulwark
StoreFAQ
Sign InJoin
HomeWatchNewslettersShowsChatSpecial ProjectsEventsFoundersArchiveAbout
The Triad

F— It: Let’s Do Greenland

Strategic ambiguity and the case for accelerationism.

Jonathan V. Last's avatar
Jonathan V. Last
January 7∙ Paid
Upgrade to listen12 minutes
890
(Composite by Hannah Yoest / Photos: Getty Images / Shutterstock)

1. Living space

Now that Stephen Miller has said the fascist part out loud—that America is strong and entitled to take whatever Lebensraum she needs—we’re at another pivot point. Will Trump TACO? Or will he attempt to annex territory belonging to a NATO member?

Not that my opinion matters, but I think I hope he does it? America trying to take Greenland might be the least-bad outcome in the long term. And yes, I know how that sounds. But walk with me:

America’s posture toward Greenland is basically the same as China’s toward Taiwan: hostile strategic ambiguity. This ambiguity helps America, just as it helps China. And the sooner the free world gets clarity so that it understands—unambiguously—what America has become, the better.

Let’s go dark today. Special dark.

Join Bulwark+ to unlock the rest🔓

Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. A subscription gets you:

  • Unlimited access to articles and newsletters including The Triad by JVL and Receipts by Catherine Rampell.
  • Ad-free editions of our shows (with transcripts) and member-only shows like The Secret Podcast.
  • Plus community chats and commenting features. Your support helps keep our work sustainable and available to those who cannot afford a membership. Cancel anytime.
Join
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Sign up to get a FREE daily dose of sanity in your inbox.

The Bulwark
HomeWatchShowsChatSpecial ProjectsEventsFoundersArchiveAbout
Get the Bulwark appInstagramFacebookYouTube
© 2026 Center Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice