Because both sides do absolutely everything if you look hard enough. Generally only one side is sufficiently mobilized on a particular issue to truly pose an immediate threat though. As JVL pointed out in a post a few weeks ago the right has so many structural advantages for at least a decade that the left can barely hope to do anythin…
Because both sides do absolutely everything if you look hard enough. Generally only one side is sufficiently mobilized on a particular issue to truly pose an immediate threat though. As JVL pointed out in a post a few weeks ago the right has so many structural advantages for at least a decade that the left can barely hope to do anything but keep a stalemate. The right is also completely mobilized on these illiberal things while the left is very fragmented and the illiberal part is a an isolated part of the progressive piece of the party. Don't let social media fool you into thinking otherwise. Perhaps we should be focusing on the fact we have no water right now and temporarily ignore the fact that our rations will only last another year?
Because both sides do absolutely everything if you look hard enough. Generally only one side is sufficiently mobilized on a particular issue to truly pose an immediate threat though. As JVL pointed out in a post a few weeks ago the right has so many structural advantages for at least a decade that the left can barely hope to do anything but keep a stalemate. The right is also completely mobilized on these illiberal things while the left is very fragmented and the illiberal part is a an isolated part of the progressive piece of the party. Don't let social media fool you into thinking otherwise. Perhaps we should be focusing on the fact we have no water right now and temporarily ignore the fact that our rations will only last another year?