So I read Mike's article. Its mostly a rant about the audacity of being civil in public while having discourse in journalistic venues. So he prefers a man like Trump that tells it like it is and in public is even more rude and ill mannered (not surprising). I guess he wanted Bill to attack his platitudes in writing but also follow this u…
So I read Mike's article. Its mostly a rant about the audacity of being civil in public while having discourse in journalistic venues. So he prefers a man like Trump that tells it like it is and in public is even more rude and ill mannered (not surprising). I guess he wanted Bill to attack his platitudes in writing but also follow this up with a round house when he saw him at the conference. (sorry, its driving me nuts that the intellectuals under Trump suddenly thing they are pseudo MMA fighters but literally melt when they see a BLM protest). A few micro takes on his finer points, however. He sarcastically states, "the right lost its mind in voting for secure borders, better trade deals, and an end to pointless foreign war". My friends who voted for Trump did not vote for secure borders. They state that they voted because they wanted their son to have a job and not be replaced by Mexican workers. This fact did not stand up to rational logic then and in our short supply of workers currently is less relevance. Combine this with the fact that immigration from south has been occurring in droves since the 90s and all presidents have built walls and added border patrols. Literally nobody has not tried to secure the border. They voted for better trade deals? My high school diploma friends use the word policy only to describe their dislike for the price of gas at the pump. To the point they rise to level of my economic degree is like having an argument about macro economics using only the price of milk, again, not a rational conversation.
While Mike writes that the intellectuals in MAGA land voted for secure borders and better trade deals. The vast majority of the base, i assure you, voted because of Men reading Dr. Seuss in libraries while wearing a dress. An act that attacks their sensibilities of the true philosophical leanings they have that all things in the bible are true. And here is the true rub. Charlie, Damon, JVL, Bill did not move away from you Mike because they changed. You moved away from them because you are willing to enmesh your religion with your politics to the point the neither are distinguishable and any tyrant is justified by presence of power. If you think somebody canceling somebody on twitter is violence? How is MTG talking about space lasers by Jews not a declaration of war? Truly, the fact that they are civil in public while you hold boast rhetoric of revolution and hold charities for Sheriffs....I man, why not hold a charity for Police Chiefs of major cities? That is where all the crime is right? Am I right? p.s. Mike, violence did not birth America. It was the side effect of the struggle against tyranny.
So I read Mike's article. Its mostly a rant about the audacity of being civil in public while having discourse in journalistic venues. So he prefers a man like Trump that tells it like it is and in public is even more rude and ill mannered (not surprising). I guess he wanted Bill to attack his platitudes in writing but also follow this up with a round house when he saw him at the conference. (sorry, its driving me nuts that the intellectuals under Trump suddenly thing they are pseudo MMA fighters but literally melt when they see a BLM protest). A few micro takes on his finer points, however. He sarcastically states, "the right lost its mind in voting for secure borders, better trade deals, and an end to pointless foreign war". My friends who voted for Trump did not vote for secure borders. They state that they voted because they wanted their son to have a job and not be replaced by Mexican workers. This fact did not stand up to rational logic then and in our short supply of workers currently is less relevance. Combine this with the fact that immigration from south has been occurring in droves since the 90s and all presidents have built walls and added border patrols. Literally nobody has not tried to secure the border. They voted for better trade deals? My high school diploma friends use the word policy only to describe their dislike for the price of gas at the pump. To the point they rise to level of my economic degree is like having an argument about macro economics using only the price of milk, again, not a rational conversation.
While Mike writes that the intellectuals in MAGA land voted for secure borders and better trade deals. The vast majority of the base, i assure you, voted because of Men reading Dr. Seuss in libraries while wearing a dress. An act that attacks their sensibilities of the true philosophical leanings they have that all things in the bible are true. And here is the true rub. Charlie, Damon, JVL, Bill did not move away from you Mike because they changed. You moved away from them because you are willing to enmesh your religion with your politics to the point the neither are distinguishable and any tyrant is justified by presence of power. If you think somebody canceling somebody on twitter is violence? How is MTG talking about space lasers by Jews not a declaration of war? Truly, the fact that they are civil in public while you hold boast rhetoric of revolution and hold charities for Sheriffs....I man, why not hold a charity for Police Chiefs of major cities? That is where all the crime is right? Am I right? p.s. Mike, violence did not birth America. It was the side effect of the struggle against tyranny.
Disagree.