Not Every Tragedy Is a Racial Lesson
And not every irresponsible cop is a murderer.
Reliving the awful details of George Floydās slow suffocation is brutal and emotionally draining. While it would be ideal if all Americans felt the pain of this death, itās not true. As always in matters touching on race, the thrum of ethnic hostilities is the background noise. Some have been eager, since the trial began, to cite George Floydās drug use or heart trouble as the true cause of death (arguments the prosecution has effectively debunked). Others have argued that if Floyd had simply agreed to enter the squad car, he would be alive todayāas if that exonerates the officers.
But it seems that the shadow of Chauvin is obscuring our ability to make distinctions and respond rationally to other, similar cases.
Similar is the operative word. In the space of a few days, weāve seen a police officer shoot and kill Daunte Wright in Minnesota and learned of a December case in which two police officers pointed guns at and pepper sprayed Army Lt. Caron Nazario. They may be similar on the surface, but they are quite different in the details.
When I first heard of the Wright case, it was described as a ātraffic stopā for expired tags, so I was stunned to see a video of the police attempting to handcuff Wright. Iāve been stopped for expired tags, and the encounter resulted only in a ticket and a court summons. So what gives? Was this a case of driving while black? Were the police harassing the young man because, as another account put it, he had āair freshenerā tags hanging from his rear view mirror?
Well, Minnesota law does forbid hanging items from car mirrors, and the Minnesota ACLU says these laws are sometimes pretexts to stop black drivers. But in this case, it doesnāt seem that the police needed a pretext. The tags were expired. After checking on the vehicle through their database, the police found that there was an outstanding arrest warrant for Wright. He had failed to appear in court (via Zoom) for a āgross misdemeanorā charge of carrying a pistol without a permit, and for fleeing police on another occasion.
As the police were attempting to take Wright into custody, he pulled away. One of the cops said āDaunte, donāt run,ā but Wright got back into the driverās seat. Office Kim Potter shouted āTaser, taser, taser!ā before tragically firing her gun at him instead. As soon as the deed was done, she cried, āHoly shit, I shot him.ā
This is a tragedy, leaving a grieving family (including Wrightās 2-year-old daughter) behind. Clearly, the officer who fired the gun made a disastrous mistake. But thatās a far cry not just from Chauvinās depraved conduct but from many other recent cases of police violence, as in the cases of Tamir Rice, Walter Scott, Philando Castile, Breonna Taylor, and Eric Garner. Intent matters, as the jurors in the Chauvin case will soon be instructed. Chauvin had nine and a half minutes to consider the consequences of his actions. Officer Potter, though she committed a horrible error by reaching for her gun instead of her taser, pretty clearly did not intend to kill. She should never again be in a position to harm anyone, but this was not, it seems to me based on the known facts so far, a case of malevolent police conduct. And to the degree that press accounts stress the ātraffic stopā aspect of this case, they are distorting the story.
Nor is the rush to judgment about Potter fair. I think I know what happened. And you may think you know what happened. But the demand that Potter be summarily fired, voiced by reporters at the mayorās press conference on Monday, is unjust. Remember the rule of law? The city manager, responding to calls for her dismissal, said that she was entitled to due process first. He has now been fired. Thatās how mobs work, not well-functioning polities. Potter announced her resignation on Tuesday.
Iām honestly not sure about the case of Lt. Nazario. The police seem to have overreacted, no question. But Nazarioās behavior struck me as odd.
Nazario, an Army medic, was driving to his home in Virginia in a new SUV that lacked a rear license plate. He had taped a temporary one to the inside of the back window, but that wasnāt visible to police until they got close. According to several accounts, officer Daniel Crocker attempted to pull Nazario over but Nazario didnāt stop. This prompted Crocker to put out a call that a vehicle was āeluding police.ā Officer Joe Gutierrez offered assistance. When Nazario pulled into a gas station, both officers came at him with guns drawn demanding to see his hands and that he exit the vehicle.
I donāt know about you, but on the rare occasions that Iāve been flagged down by police, I pull over right awayāor as soon as it is safe to do so. To keep driving for a mile or more seems likely to arouse the copsā suspicion. We know that it did in this case because Crocker called for reinforcements. Itās reasonable to drive to a well-lit place before stopping. But signaling compliance to cops seems important. Did he slow down and turn on his hazard lights? Did he gesture out the window somehow? The drawn guns were probably excessive, though itās important to note that the police pulled their guns before knowing the identity of the driver.
What happened next just seemed a bit staged to me. Watching the video, you see overheated cops with guns drawn screaming at Nazario to exit the car, and Nazario weirdly declining to comply yet carefully placing his cell phone camera on the dashboard to capture the whole encounter. To their repeated demands that he exit the car, he gives odd responses like āWhatās going on?ā They keep screaming at him to get out of the car and get on the ground and he keeps saying āCalm downā or āCan I speak to your supervisor?ā Eventually, officer Gutierrez sprays Nazario directly in the face. Now temporarily blinded, Nazario struggles, yet continues to evade their shouted instructions to exit the car, eventually saying that heās afraid to do so. Gutierrez, enraged, unhelpfully replies, āYeah, you should be.ā Honestly, if youāve watched enough of these awful videos you hold your breath for Nazario because heās taking some serious risks. Of course he was right that he did nothing wrong. But he invited some degree of escalation by failing to comply.
The whole episode has a performative feel, at least to me. It may seem crazy to suggest that Nazario was second-guessing the situationāand this new account lends credence to the idea that his conduct was based on fearābut it sure looked like he was playing with fire. He could have been shot. And yet, that careful placement of the cell phone camera and the refusal to follow police instructions, well, it just seemed to this observer that it was less Chauvin than a made-for-social media moment. Oh, and a lawsuit, of course. Nazario has sued the town of Windsor, Virginia. Gutierrez has already been fired.
Itās not news that we have a serious problem with violence in this countryāby citizens and police alike. But we compound that problem by forcing every new incidentāvideotape preferredāinto a pre-digested narrative. Both the Wright and Nazario cases are examples of human weakness, poor judgment, and tragedy, but itās not clear that they are morality plays.
[Editor's note, April 14, 2021, 9:10 a.m.: This article has been updated to reflect new reporting about Lt. Nazario.]
