It's why JVL is "always" right and Sarah/Charlie are wrong: the latter are unwilling to see it as fundamentally a voter problem and instead want it to be a leadership problem. There are potentially a host of pyschological/self-interest reasons for why one would think this, but the long story short is that if you aren't willing to see it…
It's why JVL is "always" right and Sarah/Charlie are wrong: the latter are unwilling to see it as fundamentally a voter problem and instead want it to be a leadership problem. There are potentially a host of pyschological/self-interest reasons for why one would think this, but the long story short is that if you aren't willing to see it as an issue of what the voters want, and thus what the party actually is, then any remedy isn't going to address the actual cause.
It's why JVL is "always" right and Sarah/Charlie are wrong: the latter are unwilling to see it as fundamentally a voter problem and instead want it to be a leadership problem. There are potentially a host of pyschological/self-interest reasons for why one would think this, but the long story short is that if you aren't willing to see it as an issue of what the voters want, and thus what the party actually is, then any remedy isn't going to address the actual cause.