104 Comments
User's avatar
Leigh O'Mara's avatar

The level of entitlement is truly staggering.

David Hurwitz's avatar

Jr., in my judgement, is Von ShitzInPantz’s most dangerous nominee by far given his conspiratorial thinking and embrace of junk science. I am not a mental health professional but I think it would behoove the Senators involved in his nomination hearing to explore the possibility that his adolescent narcotics addiction may have permanently distorted his ability to think rationally.

And I would implore all Americans that don’t have an immediate death wish and want to live to be reasonably old to contact their Senators and encourage them to oppose his nomination.

Jeff Lazar's avatar

If all these gems were to be published (assuming our democracy survives) they would certainly be interesting reading for future historians.

lebele's avatar

The Kennedy clan has advocated nepotism for generations. The most egregious event was appointing RFK as Attorney General for his brother. Before 1961, that ran against the traditions of the U.S. established by George Washington. After the JFK administration the ban was enacted into law.

Diana E's avatar

Sorry, Bobby Kennedy was brilliant.

lebele's avatar

It was still nepotism, which should never have happened. "Brilliance" is irrelevant to corruption.

Diana E's avatar

Obviously you haven’t read much history. Nepotism has been around for millennia and there has never been a truly merit based system. As the saying goes, “it’s not what you know so much as who you know.”

lebele's avatar

That is not true in American history. Aside from the openly corrupt Donald Trump, can you name another U.S. president who has pulled such a stunt?

Diana E's avatar

1) “Millenia” encompasses thousands of years, 2) nepotism exists in all levels of government, to some extent, as well as public and private companies and non profits, the reality is that connections between people matter in the choices we make as humans, 3) the reality is that John Quincy Adams and George Bush would likely not have advanced to become President if not for their fathers’ having been President, 4) I was originally responding to an assertion that RFK was not qualified, not talking about trump, who we all know is horrifically corrupt.

lebele's avatar

John Q. Adams and G.W. Bush were not appointed to president by their fathers. They were elected, which is not nepotism and not corrupt.

My wife and I and most of our friends worked in the U.S. Government for many decades, in the Executive and Legislative Branches and the military. We are unaware of a single instance of hiring a close relative. It is illegal.

jane's avatar

Scummy top to bottom.

Jennifer's avatar

Bulwark should never employ someone who is used by trump and GOP to get their message out. This isn't reporting, it's stenography.

Sharon King's avatar

Sad to see you leave The Bulwark, Marc. Your reporting is excellent and always informative. I see things from you I haven’t seen elsewhere. Good luck at Axios!

LeftCoastReader's avatar

It just seems that Kennedy has realized that the only path to power for the family since the glory days of the three brothers is to grab on to the indiscriminant Trump and pull up anyone else you can with you. The tragedy of the Kennedy family becomes a farce today.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 14, 2024
Comment deleted
LeftCoastReader's avatar

This is true, but RFKjr is living in the past, and seemingly wants to resurrect Camelot. No doubt as a son of an assassinated leader, he has lived with a level of grief that most of us will never encounter. That grief and perhaps wanting to turn back the clock to before it all happened drives him to seek power through the only path he sees as avaliable to him.

Prairy's avatar

Mark, we will miss your reporting at The Bulwark. Good luck at Axios!

J AZ's avatar

Terrific reporting, Marc, thank you. I'm stocking up on popcorn.

The insider's remark about RFKjr factions: "These groups, the adviser noted, undermine and undercut each other and anyone else they perceive as threatening to their interests" - gosh, ya just hate to see it.

Tom Cotton standing firm on objecting to Bobby's D-i-L tho? Nah, he'll fold like a limp dish rag if Trump says "boo." And Cotton having doubts about her fitness for the job - isn't that the one unifying characteristic defining Trump's nominees & appointments?

As for potential infighting at CIA between Amaryllis & John Ratcliffe, what's a little dissention & confusion at the top of our chief foreign intelligence & security agency? Those battles for pecking order were so entertaining on The Apprentice; I'm sure Putin and Xi will be endlessly amused.

Lastly, re: Bobby's interest in the JFK assassination, I hope he's not ignoring Deep Fluoride or a renegade group of dentists working in cahoots with a shadowy figure referred to as Mr. T. Decay

Kevin J. Rogers's avatar

"They all are covered in each other’s blood ... "

That's going to be the hallmark of this administration. It's straight-up mob dynamics: a small core of hardened loyalists in the middle of a snakepit.

Kim Knight's avatar

I have thought exactly that for some time now.

Kevin J. Rogers's avatar

Horrible. We won't be getting any kind of governance for a while, let alone good governance.

Diana E's avatar

However, it may mean they can do far less damage while they try to knife each other in the back.

Kevin J. Rogers's avatar

Oh yes. That’s one of the reasons why I say we have no idea what’s going to happen. They might go right back to the crabs in a bucket scenario, except infinitely more vicious than the last go-round.

There’s also no way to foresee the collateral damage from the infighting. We could see random policy shifts based on nothing more than who is winning the internal battles.

Utter chaos.

Hortense's avatar

I have to admit it is disturbing to continually see evidence that America is not getting a first, second, or even a third thought in the upcoming Trump administration. It's all everyone's personal grievance, advantage, or conspiracy.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 14, 2024
Comment deleted
Hortense's avatar

If they are not careful, they might not get the revolution that they think they are getting.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 15, 2024Edited
Comment deleted
Hortense's avatar

I would hope things won't get that ugly, but the will and wish for that is in the ether.

Nancy (South NJ coast)'s avatar

The crux:

"During the campaign, Trump promised Kennedy he would disclose all of the records concerning the assassination of his uncle, former President John F. Kennedy, in 1963. [T]he 1992 JFK Records Act . . . mandated disclosure of all documents in the case by 2017. . . . Kennedy, who is convinced that the CIA was involved in his uncle’s assassination, has advocated for Fox to help lead the agency in part to ensure those records are disclosed."

Tom Cotton and the rest of the trumpers are perfectly fine with all trump's unfit nominees--except Amaryllis Fox Kennedy for the CIA. Why is Cotton, an avatar of the far-right, going to the mattresses to stop her, despite her favor with trump? Those of us old enough to know the history of 1963 (and Watergate) might have some thoughts.

Kim Knight's avatar

I certainly do. And I remember 1963 very well. What I don't remember tho is why I was at home. I was watching the whole thing on TV with my parents and i remember them crying. I was 7 years old, so maybe 🤔 I don't remember it correctly, but it seems to be very clear in my child's mind.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 15, 2024
Comment deleted
Nancy (South NJ coast)'s avatar

He was the only shooter. Correct.

Kim Knight's avatar

No disrespect Nancy, but I can't and never will believe Oswald acted of his own accord. For too many reasons to go into here

E. A. Bare's avatar

Simply amazing. I suspect Cotton may want his wife to have a job here perhaps the same one. As for Cotton he has repeatedly proved his disloyalty to America and the Constitution, no one should be surprised that he is all in for those like Kennedy and Gabbard because of the damage they will do to America.

Jeffrey Gaines's avatar

There is sadly an endless parade of people who are most unfit for a position being greenlighted here, for dismaying reasons.

1. they have shown loyalty to Trump, so he wants to reward them.

2. they have shown a willingness to do whatever Trump wants them to do, including appear on tv regularly and spout his toxic lies about a variety of topics, hate on the media, and generally pretend they're not the swamp creatures they actually are, and/or

3. actively work to weaken the departments they head, by gutting the career professionals, putting in their own sub-stooges for Trump, and attacking various outsider groups, to highlight Trump's theatre of cruelty, which is what his voters want: people to be punished, for supposedly victimizing his voters, and of course the Victim-in-Chief, Trump himself.

It's going to be a long, long 4 ++++ years of Darkness, anti-science, anti-facts, anti-rationality, anti-civil rights, anti-environment, anti-democracy, anti-accountability, and that's the short list.

Linda Weide's avatar

When I read Project 2025 with a political book club group I saw this as a recipe for turning the US into a third world country. Somehow these oligarchs that bankrolled this, and the judges that allowed them to do so, are lacking imagination as to how shitty things can get in the US with these appointments carrying out Trump's dirty work for him of running the country into the ground, while he grifts as much as he can while once again avoiding legal consequences for his actions.

The US is like the Titanic with too many people willing to go down with the ship.

JF's avatar

4. They are telegenic, straight out of Central Casting and Fox News. Except for a notable few like border czar Homan, necessary as background to elevate the more lovely players.

OJVV's avatar

I'm certain that this country will look a lot like an airliner after it's made an unplanned landing on the side of a mountain. Chaos, bodies, and it ain't flying again.

Old Man's avatar

Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly

Jeffrey Gaines's avatar

I’m afraid you’re right. And it won’t take too long. Questions is, will Trump voters hold the incompetence and calamities against him, or one of his usual scapegoats?

I would expect it’s the former.

Kim Knight's avatar

I agree. But I think it will fly again. I'm afraid all his sycophants will succeed him with with glee. Keeping his dream alive.

M. Trosino's avatar

This is all just more evidence that the moral and ethical health of the country is shot right straight to hell and as to its intelligence, having now had constant and copious bareback liaisons with the likes of Bobby World, MAGA, the GOP, Trump and sundry Trump escorts and lamp post leaners, Al Capone's fate awaits it, to be sped handily along by the coming congress with the likes of Gabbard and Fox.

Need confirmation of that? Not to worry. The Senate's gonna' give us all confirmation and give it good and hard.

Kim Knight's avatar

M. Trosino, very well said

M. Trosino's avatar

Thank you, Kim. Happy New Year to you.

JB's avatar

Al Capone died of neurosyphilis. I hope that fate doesn’t await us.

M. Trosino's avatar

Correct. A metaphor for the country succumbing to "crazy" after putting itself in the hands of criminals and out right nut jobs.

J AZ's avatar

That's ALPHONSE Capone to us peons, please 😉

JF's avatar

I’m sure the MAGA base is thrilled with their entertaining new reality TV show.

Kim Knight's avatar

I do believe Trump is an Al Capone fan. I can't remember exactly when, but I saw a video of trump praising him for something or another.