Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harley "Griff" Lofton's avatar

I first encountered Dreher when he was being promoted in the secular press as the greatest Catholic intellectual since St. Augustine of Hippo.

I actually purchased his "The Benedict Option" only to cast it aside because his "insights" aren't deep. They aren't even superficial. Bad theology wrapped up in bad politics, wrapped up in a genuinely parochial, self centered vision of the world. Even the subtitle of the book gets everything wrong. There can't be a Post-Christian nation when there never was a "Christian" nation, in any meaningful sense of the word, to start with. Not to mention that we are living in a largely non-Christian world. There is no such thing as "Christianity" there are only Christianities.

St. Anthony of Egypt, setting the pattern for those who would flee the world, fled to the desert not because the secular world had become so evil (which it always was!)--- but as Christianity had spread in popularity it had become corrupt and incapable of delivering the tools of spiritual combat required for salvation. In fact the growing church had begun to disarm itself from spiritual combat altogether and finally, many decades later, simply becoming a political tool of the Empire. In other words the monastic impulse is not rooted so much in a retreat from the world as it is in the spiritual confrontation with the self.

The problem with the "Desert Fathers and Mothers" was the danger of delusion, mental disorder and an aberrant form of confirmation bias that lead further from baseline Christian virtues. Extremists always carry that demon in their breast.

St. Benedict and Saint Basil creatively responded to these dangers by establishing rules, that while distancing their sons and daughters from the distractions of "the world", also instilled a prudent moderation in ascetic practice. I will leave aside here the eventual corruption that led to reformers like St. Bernard, St. Francis and St. Dominic to creatively seek monastic renewal in their own time. The strongest periods of religious vitality were led by men and women creatively adapting to the changing world in which they lived and never by leaders trying to lead their flocks back into an irretrievable golden age of faith. To be honest Benedict is no longer an option for the serious Christian.

In contrast to Dreher (BA in Journalism) there is a lovely book by Patrick Henry [AB Harvard (history), MA Oxford (theology), PhD (history of Christianity) and probably studied under the great Jaroslav Pelikan] has written a lovely response called "The Benedictine OPTIONS." As the name suggests he offers a pluralistic, life embracing and world facing, and more authentic, approach to the Benedictine tradition that Dreher rides over rough shod in order to ennoble his white, Eurocentric male grievances.

https://www.ncronline.org/news/opinion/refuting-rod-dreher-author-patrick-henry-offers-benedictine-options-plural

I simply stopped taking Dreher seriously and nothing that JVL has posted about him has convinced me that I am wrong in so doing.

Dreher would also do well to abandon Twitter as the first step in an authentic spiritual journey.

Expand full comment
Damian Penny's avatar

I've unlocked the paywalled post to which JVL linked. Check it out!

Expand full comment
67 more comments...