Pakistan having nukes is not a good thing. According to all intel, Iran did not have nuclear weapon capacity. They did want to have nuclear power, as in electricity, which their nuclear program was for.
Which is why Obama and other nations had an anti-nuclear treaty with Iran. Trump pulled out of it for one reasonтАФhis tiny petty ego couldnтАЩt stand that Obama did it. Trump is a clear and present danger.
How about if we agree that no country having nukes is a good thing? Nukes have only been used twice in war, and the country that did that has 5000 nukes.
Iran not having nukes is a good thing.
No country in the Middle East should have nukes.
Pakistan having nukes is not a good thing. According to all intel, Iran did not have nuclear weapon capacity. They did want to have nuclear power, as in electricity, which their nuclear program was for.
Which is why Obama and other nations had an anti-nuclear treaty with Iran. Trump pulled out of it for one reasonтАФhis tiny petty ego couldnтАЩt stand that Obama did it. Trump is a clear and present danger.
How about if we agree that no country having nukes is a good thing? Nukes have only been used twice in war, and the country that did that has 5000 nukes.
I'm not interested in "both sides"ing this one, sorry.
YouтАЩre right. ThereтАЩs only one side. Trump/America attacked another nation with no justification.
pulling one justification from the air is as good as pulling another.
Yes, so am I.