My assumption is that the Justices were internally debating which opinion and dissent(s) to issue, and realized at the weekend that they had run out of time before Super Tuesday and needed to rush something out.
On terms of the liberals, presumably this not-dissent may have started as a lone dissent but later got merged into the 3 justices agreeing on a message.
My assumption is that the Justices were internally debating which opinion and dissent(s) to issue, and realized at the weekend that they had run out of time before Super Tuesday and needed to rush something out.
On terms of the liberals, presumably this not-dissent may have started as a lone dissent but later got merged into the 3 justices agreeing on a message.
My assumption is that the Justices were internally debating which opinion and dissent(s) to issue, and realized at the weekend that they had run out of time before Super Tuesday and needed to rush something out.
On terms of the liberals, presumably this not-dissent may have started as a lone dissent but later got merged into the 3 justices agreeing on a message.