48 Comments
User's avatar
Antonio Christopher Dittmann's avatar

First, the regime tries to force out the “other”, whoever that happens to be, often Jews. This regime has been so quiet about their plans for Jewish Americans that their intentions are conspicuous by their absence. The Jewish “shoe” has not yet dropped. But it will.

When they discover that forced expulsion is costly and politically damaging, they stop pushing people out. They start closing the exits. What comes next is written in Trump’s addled, malevolent imagination, and in the hearts of the demons that surround him. May God be watching.

Maggie's avatar

Hegseth is as disgusting as Trump, and a shameful embarrassment as a representative of our country when in other countries. I hope other countries understand he, Trump, and Trump’s other sycophants, are hated here in the US by millions of decent citizens.

Tim_TEC's avatar

"Under Donald Trump's US...it’s more interested in keeping Muslims and Africans out of Europe and the United States."

For the Trump's US, it's not all Africans, just the ones with more melanin than him. The white ones from South Africa are welcomed with open arms.

Trump's State Department even sent a plane to Johannesburg to pick up a bunch of Afrikaners with the lie that they were victims of "white genocide." Funny thing though, thousands of these refugees are returning back to South Africa because in Trump's America many feel there are greater threats in the United States citing mass shootings in public places as well as violence by US immigration officers.

Which is the actual "shit hole country"?

hrlngrv's avatar

Maybe for MAGA, the Russia-Ukraine War isn't an invasion, rather it's a kinetic adjustment of borders. Without sarcasm, good Christian Russia attacking semi-godless, LGBTQ+-loving Ukraine is praiseworthy to the US Christian right. However, Occam's razor suggests MAGA just doesn't care what Russia is trying to do to Ukraine, but they do care about nonwhites in Europe.

rlritt's avatar

The real solution, which is probably impossible, would be to somehow figure how to insure that all countries provide a safe and prosperous environment for all their citizens. Why must people emigrate en mass to more prosperous and safe countries because they can't safe and prosperous in their own. I've spoken to many immigrants who miss their homeland and would rather live there than in Europe or North America.

rlritt's avatar

I have a weird view of immigration and racism. Several years ago I had a female friend who had lived in France and became involved with a French man who was educated and a professional. She wanted to move back to the US with him.

He came with her, but it was impossible for him to get residency and a temporary work permit. They were told he could only get a temp work permit if they were married. Meanwhile, at the immigration office, people from third world countries were easily getting temporary work permits and visas.

Clearly immigration is much easier for cheap labor than for people from developed countries who are educated. They eventually were married, but it still took time to get a work permit.

Catman's avatar

Maybe Pete should reflect upon his Norwegian ancestors who fled Europe for the opportunity for a better life in this country--everyone here is an immigrant, from the peoples who crossed from Asia

30,000+ years ago to populate this land to the new arrivals landing today--what gives Hegseth his air of primacy that his ancestor's arrival time predates that of others when the people who got here first were the victims of genocide and dispossession by later arrivals

dave's avatar

Especially in the context of Ukraine, I sometimes wish something like this could happen:

A valiant reporter would, when called upon, say “I really like that tie you’re wearing, Mr. President!”

What happens next would depend on his response, of course. Presumably he would kvell and preen, and hopefully eventually prod the reporter to continue.

Or maybe he would just nod.

The point is that the intrepid reporter could then say “I’m going to come up there and take it right off your neck.“

Whatever happened next would be vastly illuminating.

I can imagine various replies, like “I’d like to see you try!“

My assumption is that in the best case the poor reporter would be thrown out out of the room and denied access to ever again attend a press conference with the president.

But quite possibly they would be escorted out by the Secret Service in handcuffs and would henceforth be subject to all kinds of government surveillance for threatening the life of the president.

So it would indeed take someone of extraordinary courage to even try a stunt like that.

Even if done as a joke, or as a teaching metaphor, it wouldn’t be taken that way. The gasps alone would drown out any legitimate titters or laughter, and even, perhaps, reflection.

Presumably.

Although our intrepid hero would almost certainly be hanged in effigy in some quarters, and perhaps more than figuratively in the legal system, in other houses, their picture might well be mounted by the door, or hung on dorm walls, along with pictures of the pope, saints, sexpots, and other heroes with attributes that so many people admire.

Julie Vassilatos's avatar

I'm so glad someone somewhere is making the deal out of this that it deserves. Their racist rhetoric is getting more disgusting by the day. I thought this egregious misuse of D-Day was appalling and I'm very grateful you called it out. Few did.

Don White's avatar

Claims by our Felonious Oath-Breaker and his Project 2025 ninnies - Rubio, Vance, etc. - against "massive" migration consistently ignore the underlying reasons driving large migrations of people who otherwise wouldn't willingly leave their homes and abandon their families and traditions.

Factors such as famine, war, and climate change.

LeftCoastReader's avatar

I really like this phrasing:

“More than 4,400 Allied troops died on D-Day. They gave their lives to defeat a regime that judged people by race and religion. Let’s not dishonor them by allowing that sickness to spread in or from the government of the United States.”

I don’t think anyone has said it better.

Gianni Coastal's avatar

When we end up with a junk Iran deal, they will then need to find a scapegoat and boogeyman for high beef & inflation so they will start pointing to immigrants (people that don’t look like MAGAts) to blame. Vance vice liar will be scaring up with Fox fear channel feeding their favorite storyline

Joe Turner's avatar

Fantastic piece. Thanks Will

Tojoyama's avatar

“Trump has systematically barred black and brown refugees from the United States. For six consecutive months, his administration has allowed white South Africans to gain asylum while rejecting all other applicants.“

So this, this is what ‘they’ voted for? Just asking for a friend, people are saying.

I would be curious if some focus groups could approach this and see how Trump’s support holds up with his triple voters. They may not like the grocery prices but I suspect they do like this. It would have to be nuanced so not to flat out sound like one is asking ‘so are you liking the racist immigration policy?’ OR has this been done several times?

Ask about prices, ask about immigrants from Africa and South America, ask about Iran, ask about immigrants from Europe, ask about the corruption, ask about the white immigrants from South Africa.

‘Trump, he gets it’

Julie Vassilatos's avatar

As a former devoted conservative who has long since stepped away from the GOP, I can tell you that the last thing these folks are clinging to--having abandoned every other value--is white cultural primacy. "Trump, he gets it."

Richard Kane's avatar

It's amazing how Rubio can blatantly show hatred towards immigrants when he's an "anchor baby"!

rlritt's avatar

I was thinking the same thing. Weren't his parents brown people from a 3rd world country?

Slide Guitar's avatar

I'm sure they consider _other_ Cubans to be brown.