459 Comments

Bill, over the decades I literally can never recall ever disagreeing with you on anything.

In this case, I'm struggling with the idea of punishing the soldiers, who apparently were fighting at night and under unspeakable duress.

Imagine if the media were criticizing the U.S. military after each little bombing during WW2. The U.S. carpet-bombed German cities killing tens of thousands of people per night, but it was necessary to defeat Hitler. Otherwise we would all be saluting Nazi leaders to this day.

An idea I have is that reporters who are allowed to report on the war must be required to actually be fighting in battle alongside the soldiers, to ensure that reporters are being realistic in their critiques of all the efforts to keep Israel from being wiped off the map.

Expand full comment

I can think of many disagreements I’ve had with Mr. Kristol. They are exemplified by the way I felt watching his smug self regard on Sunday shows when the 2nd Iraq war (that he, Dick, Scooter and Donny Wrestles authored) was going well. I now admire his commitment to democracy, but his blaming the killing of aid workers on individual soldiers rather than on systemic problems with Israel’s prosecution of this war seems typical for him.

Expand full comment

I'm late to the game, here, and there are likely others who commented on this yesterday, but...

"Trump nominated many excellent men and women to the judiciary. A confident conservative majority, grounded in originalism and textualism, now controls the Supreme Court."

This is disingenuous at best.

Expand full comment
founding

I want to comment on Will Selber's discussion of the recent tragedy in Gaza as well as the ongoing tragedy that is that war. Thank you, Will for your insight as very few of us have the experience you have in combat, particularly in the type of war that is happening in Gaza. I have signed up for your blog and I am looking forward to more of your work.

I read Will's piece, "On Gaza," and I highly recommend folks go to his library and read that article (link: https://grumpycombatveteran.substack.com/p/on-gaza?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2. It is excellent and I learned a lot about what is happening in Gaza and why. I also recommend that you subscribe to his blog.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the always excellent newsletter. Just a quick observation. Will Selber is categorically stating that Israel's Defence Forces made a "disastrous mistake". Until we know the outcome of a full and complete independent investigation isn't it a little early to make such an assertion? Again, thanks for your great work.

Expand full comment

If you don't think conservative judges have been legislating from the bench...you haven't been paying attention 🙄 Originalism and textualism is long for...doing what we want to do.

Expand full comment

IDF killed seven aid workers with the World Kitchen. Also aid workers all over the Gaza Strip have been killed. This same action happens year after year somewhere on earth. But it keeps happening. The definition of Insanity.

I am overtired of these two states trying to wipe out each other. Yes, I know Israel and Palestine have their “reasons”, that in my opinion don’t stand for anything if both countries are destroyed. For established countries to be fighting for a piece of the pie, give it up. There isn’t any planetary reason two or more countries not to equally settle differences. Sit down talk, listen, observe, agree, keeping working until peace in your countries. For those monster leaders that think the world is theirs…let me say ‘No one gets out alive’. So stop the chest thumping!

Yea, wishful, nonsensical thinking, most assuredly. As optimist as I can be today.

Give Peace A Chance.

Expand full comment

I agree with you, but I don't think that talking will do it. They're going to have to be forced to it. And I don't mean "forced" in the figurative sense of "pressured". I mean quite literally "forced', in the sense of "not being offered another alternative or an opportunity to resist."

Israel is going to have to be forced to protect and provide for the civilians in Gaza while they finish eliminating Hamas.

When the fighting is over, Israel and the Palestinians are going to have to be forced to accept two states. Israel is going to have to be forced to evacuate Gaza and the West Bank -- all of it, contingent on the presence of Arab peacekeepers and Arab-financed rebuilding. The Palestinians will have be forced to accept Gaza and the West Bank as their state -- period. Sovereign but demilitarized. Any "Right of Return" will only apply to "returning" to the new Palestinian State.

I foresee the "two states living side by side in peace", at least for the rest of my life, as nothing like the Netherlands living side by side in peace with Belgium, but very much like East Germany and West Germany living side by side in peace at the height of the Cold War. There will probably be impenetrable barriers between them, as there were between East and West Germany. There will have to be an internationally guaranteed highway, rail corridor and air link between the West Bank and Gaza subject to Israeli oversight, as there was between West Germany and West Berlin, subject to East German oversight. It will certainly be suboptimal ... but given a fair chance, it will be better than anything either side has had for the last 76 years. And, maybe by the time my granddaughters are my age, they will have stopped hating and fearing each other enough to want to make it better.

Expand full comment

The problem is that the other Muslim countries don't want that to happen. They want the war to continue.

Expand full comment
Apr 5·edited Apr 5

He certainly was ahead of his peers. But it was the it was the Egyptian Islamists that Nasser had jailed and he had freed and thought he had won over who gunned him down. As I was writing this, I realized for the first time that Sadat's assassination at one level was a kind of foreshadowing of Yitzhak Rabin's, both killed by extremists that they hoped they were bringing around to their point of view.

Expand full comment

Carter for all of his faults did just that with Israel and Egypt. Problem is it's in Iran's (and Russia's) perceived interests to keep the Middle East a giant killing machine.

Expand full comment

Sadat really wanted peace: that was a huge difference, and a unique opportunity. And he died for it, a lesson not lost on any Arab leader after that.

Expand full comment

How were the Oslo Accords "laughably one-sided"? Certainly Israel's withdrawl from Gaza in 2005 and removal of all Jews wasn't one-sided.

Expand full comment

you mean the withdrawal after occupation since 1967?

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment

Bill, re our pro-democracy coalition and our "efforts with different messages using different mechanisms can get to different groups of voters" - the only voters who matter are the swing voters in WI, MI & PA. By all accounts, Biden MUST win those states to win the EC, so we all must support those Dem state parties: https://wisdems.org/, https://michigandems.com/, and https://www.padems.com/.

Another organization to support is Focus for Democracy (https://www.focus4democracy.org/). They have identified other organizations who are targeting swing voters in the swing states with evidence-backed messages that are proven to work. They turned me on to Galvanize Action (https://www.galvanizeaction.org/) who I'm supporting. They craft appeals to moderate women in rural, small town, and suburban communities who want progress on key issues, AKA swing voters.

Expand full comment

Andrew, you said Israel "is a key ally in a region where most everyone would rather see them (and America, for that matter) wiped off the map." They want us out of their back yard. If we did that, would they still want us wiped off the map?

Expand full comment

One other note — the killed aid workers, yes, for sure, a tragedy. But where was the writer's empathy for more than 32,000 murdered Palestinians? How could anyone write about only the aid workers and somehow neglect the tens of thousands of Gazans killed, being killed, and who will be killed? "Every flashpoint like the WCK strike threatens to broaden the anti-war coalition beyond those with pro-Palestinian priors." Rarely have I read such blindness. The antiwar coalition has been massive for months.

Expand full comment

Blindness?! WCK workers are neutral but working for Gazans. I read the author to be making a RELATIVE statement.."broaden" and not commenting on current size of antiwar coalition.

Expand full comment

What a sadly distorted view of the Israel-Palestine war. Biden isn't butting heads with just the "progressives" who see "the Jewish state of Israel" as colonizer, etc. He's butting heads with every decent American who sees the continuous slaughter of Palestinians, mostly women and children. And all decent Americans smart enough to know that if war could settle Israel's problems with Gaza, its problems would have come to and end decades ago, many wars ago. The solution is two states but Israel's right-wing leaders simply will not countenance "decency." Now the U.S. is going down with an ally that spits in our face. We've lost what little credibility we had in the Arab world, and we'll pay for it for much longer than this war. Secretary of State George C. Marshall and Defense Secretary James Forrestal both saw this coming in 1948. Let the U.N. handle Palestine, they urged, STRONGLY. We should stay the hell out of that mess. But Truman screwed the United States but good.

Expand full comment
Apr 5·edited Apr 5

I'm a "decent American", thank you, and I'm aware, as you don't seem to be, that those Palestinian civilians are being used as human shields by the terrorists who should be protecting them but are hiding behind them instead.

By all means, state your opinions, whether well or poorly based, but spare us your noisome moral posturing, and particularly the attempt to speak for "every decent American." You don't, and from that position, you can't.

Expand full comment

My dear Mr. Brown:

Pray, good sir, if I may be so bold — I am in receipt of your kind letter of 4 April 2024. Just one more bit of noisome moral posturing.

Palestinian women and children murdered by Netanyahu and the IDF aren't responsible for the hideous actions of Hamas. They'd tell you that themselves if they could. But they can't. They're dead.

With warmest regards,

I am, and remain,

Your most humble & obedient servant,

The voice of every decent American

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

You left this out in your assessment: Hamas is not in favor of two states. Their mission is to destroy Israel. Also, Israel WAS in favor of 2 states from Oslo to the Netenyahu regime. What happened after Oslo? Suicide bombings by Hamas, among other violence. You left that out too.

Expand full comment

Should Israel let Hamas write their shared destiny?

Expand full comment

I don't understand your question.

Expand full comment

A successful two-state solution means peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike. This, peace with Jews, is antithetical for Hamas. It voids their whole ideology and power basis. Israel abandoning the pursuit of peaceful coexistence as a national policy goal *in response to Hamas terrorism* is giving Hamas exactly what they want.

Expand full comment

OK. Agree with that.

Expand full comment

Of course Hamas opposes two states. That's why Netanyahu has always preferred that Hamas stick around. And the only proposals for a Palestine state have been laughably one-sided, in Israel's favor, of course. None has been a serious proposal. Hence the constant violence. Add up the body count sometime. See who's "ahead" in that.

Expand full comment

There are several elements in the reporting of Aid workers being killed in Gaza that present serious differences of perceived truth as presented in most major US media and by President Biden in contrast to reports and the skepticism expressed in other credible western and middle east sources.

Many Canadians and Europeans have indicated possibility that Netanyahu administration specifically ordered attack on these vehicles as probably Hamas involved, in spite of IDF being assured of their Humanitarian bona fide. There is also great credulity about the supposed outrage from President Biden about the incident, particularly give no hesitancy of his what-so-ever in continuing weapons shipments to Israel under the cloud of charges at International Court of Justice (ICJ) of Israeli genocide against innocent Palestinians during this conflict.

For decades US politicians and government officials have constantly used term of "erring on the side of caution", yet in regard this specific aspect of humanitarian treatment and assistance for refugees in Gaza, there always seems to be "absolutes" accruing to Netanyahu decisions and actions, and Biden acceding to those Israeli positions.

Expand full comment

"NYT BREAKING NEWS

President Biden told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that future U.S. support “will be determined” by how Israel treats civilians in Gaza."

Expand full comment

Providing air-to-ground fires in a complex environment is militarily critical yet inevitably risky. The possibility of friendly-fire killings - which is what this essentially was - is inescapable. Even US AC-130 gunships, which have even better sensors and are routinely in communication with ground forces in proximity to a target, have been known to make this sort of mistake, as in Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan when a Special Forces team leading Afghan fighters was killed. Of course the circumstances should be reviewed and whatever lessons may emerge should be learned. But passing judgment from an armchair half a world away is an even riskier enterprise.

Expand full comment

A clearly marked convoy, in a DECONFLICTED ROUTE from one warehouse to another with full IDF knowledge, is not a fog of war scenario. Three hellfire missiles hitting 3 vehicles over a mile and a half is not collateral damage. Israel wants to starve Gaza, these people are from an NGO trying to help feed Gaza. Intentional murder ordered by someone trying to make a point.

Expand full comment

This wasn't a situation where there was an active firefight in the area. This was a situation where the IDF thought that there may have been an armed person in the convoy so they destroyed the convoy. There was no imminent threat to IDF forces.

Expand full comment

I'm no progressive. I'm a former Republican turned left-of-center Democrat. I'm also a practicing Christian that grew up thinking Israel and its leadership could do no wrong. I'm well past that point. Biden needs to start holding Israel accountable, or he needs to cut off the funds. PERIOD.

Will Selber's characterization of the WCK tragedy (a group that I donate to) was a "disastrous mistake" is either naive or sanitized. The IDF struck the first vehicle. The wounded exited to the next vehicle. The IDF struck that vehicle. Those that could move then moved to the third vehicle where they finally all succumbed. This is the same well-trained and funded IDF that just hours earlier had carried out a precision strike in enemy territory (Syria).

My guess is that the unit that carried out the strikes knew full well it was the WCK aid workers. They apparently "suspected" a terrorist was with them. They also think starving civilians (including children) is okay in war, and they don't like the fact that WCK is feeding Gazans. The whole thing is sickening. I really had hoped The Bulwark would not succumb to the unquestioned support of Israel. We have leverage. They need to either stop committing war crimes, or we stop supporting their war. PERIOD. This was a very disappointing piece.

Expand full comment

In the words of the esteemed and sorely-missed Charlie Sykes, Will Selber AYFKM with this sterile interpretation of events? Truly disappointed in The Bulwark’s sustained, deafening silence and unambiguously one-sided, conspicuously uncritical stance when the facts and blood-curdling horror on the ground couldn’t be more plain to see.

Expand full comment

Will Selber characterized the murder of the 7 World Central Kitchen volunteers as a "disasterous mistake." I was shocked by that characterization because we were both clearly working from the same Haaretz piece (recognized the quote). To say that Selber provided a HIGHLY sanitized version of the facts is an understatement:

1) World Central Kitchen is a non-profit organization that feeds people in times of need be it due to natural disasters or conflict, in many countries including the U.S. They have an impeccable reputation in their 15 years of operation, in at least 14 countries, some of which are the most dangerous places in the world (e.g. Syria, Ukraine, and a number of unstable African countries). No one has even dared to suggest that WCK volunteers were in any way involved with terrorists. EVER.

2) The WCK trucks had "World Central Kitchen" placards emblazoned on the roofs & on the side panels. This is important because the IDF bombs were deployed from drones that have EXCELLENT optics--we're not talking a trigger happy pilot flying at mach 3.

3) The route was cleared in advance with the IDF, and the entire transport took place with coordination with the IDF.

4) Israel hasn't said that the trucks were accidentally misidentified and bombed, which seems to be the implication of characterizing the attack as a "mistake".

The actual narrative from the IDF itself isn't that they didn't know they were bombing WCK trucks--their excuse is that some unspecified source of information lead them to SUSPECT that the convoy had a single terrorist. "Suspect" was the verb used. Based on a suspicion alone they knowingly slaughtered 7 WCK workers. More about that below.

5) Selber's description of the attack makes it sound like three missiles were fired at the three trucks in quick succession. That is NOT how it happened.

Just as when IDF soldiers slaughtered 3 Israeli hostages in December, there was a significant time lapse between the first shot fired and the last, with IDF communication in between.

6) Here's how it actually went down per the same bloody Haaretz piece Selber was using. First, the drone took out truck #1. Luckily no one was injured. The second they were attacked, the remaining two trucks CONTACTED THE IDF and notified them that they had been bombed by mistake and to please stop.

The occupants of truck #1 transferred supplies and personnel to the remaining two trucks, and proceeded on their way (it's safe to assume at least 5-10 minutes elapsed) when truck #2 was immediately struck by another drone missile. This time the occupants were not so lucky, they were injured but at least no one was killed.

At this point the workers rushed the injured and remaining passengers into the final truck and took off towards the nearest hospital. This is when missile #3 destroyed vehicle #3, killing all 7 WCK workers.

7) Guess who they didn't find among the fatalities? The imaginary terrorist.

When the IDF and Israeli war cabinet say that the bombings were a "mistake" and were not targeted, what they are in effect saying is that the bombings were only a mistake because they were wrong about the presence of a suspected Hamas terrorist in the convoy. And it was pretty impossible of them to try claim otherwise given that all of the volunteers were European with the exception of two who were dual nationality Palestinian-American/Canadians. Had the IDF found a random Palestinian male among the causalities you can bet your life they'd be justifying the killing of the 7 volunteers, and they'd be using that as an excuse to shut down WCK so that the Israeli siege of Gaza can continue.

8) The timing is incredibly suspicious:

March 29 --> ICJ orders Israel to STOP blocking aid into Gaza (for the second time).

March 30 --> An Israeli sniper shoots through the windshield of a World Central Kitchen van, fortunately the driver was not injured. WCK immediately launched a complaint with the IDF about the shooting.

Oh and I didn't learn about the sniper shooting that occurred on Saturday from other sources, the EXACT same information was in the Haaretz piece that the author used for his commentary.

On the timing issue, remember that when the ICJ first ruled on the issue a couple of months ago, Israel was instructed to stop starving out the population of Gaza. Within 24 hours, Israel shut down the UNRWA operations in Gaza.

9) Finally, in case you think that "accidental" bombings of food aid workers is a common occurrence, think again.

You know how many WCK volunteers have been killed in the 15 year history of the program, running it in the most dangerous places in the world? Prior to Monday, ONE. In 2023 a Ukrainian volunteer was killed when a Russian missle hit his apartment building.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

There has been intentional silence on the Bulwark relating to the conflict in Gaza which coincided with public opinion clearly shifting as Israel's conduct became more and more extreme.

JVL famously made a commitment to call out Israel for war crimes, if it were to be proven that Israel was intentionally cutting off water, food, power, fuel and medicine to civilians. Problem with his commitment was that the Israeli government had already been proudly boasting about said actions for at least a week at that point.

Needless to say, JVL never issued a mea culpa, and has never dared to criticize Israel.

Then we have Mona Charen who is so in the tank for Israel that one of her pieces unironically had a headline claiming Israel abides by international law. Sigh.

I was hopeful that this latest atrocity would finally break the Bulwark's silence on this issue--especially as it is becoming clear that the disappointment of young voters to Biden's acquiescence to Israel's demands IS GOING TO BE A SERIOUS FACTOR in the presidential election.

But boy, I certainly didn't expect to get a narrative of the killing of the 7 WCK workers from the Bulwark that could have been written by the IDF's propaganda department.

Bulwark: you can do better. I'm genuinely puzzled as to why your content is either actively pro-Israel or you go Fox News style and just ignore coverage for ideological reasons I can't understand.

Expand full comment

I wouldn’t be able to Like this enough times if I had 1000 likes. I mean, when RICHARD HAASS of all people is saying we should be open to *sanctions,* it’s time for all of us to snap to the reality of what Israel and the IDF are in 2024! There has been so much more focus on here on Western Hamasniks — as truly disgusting as I find them — than on the daily unspooling reality that Israel is far exceeding its mandate in responding to a truly disgusting terror attack & edging ever closer to being an international pariah state, and marking the Biden Administration as it does so.

Expand full comment
Apr 4·edited Apr 4

There was an entirely too simplistic contribution to a morning shots about a week ago from Selber discussing the logistical difficulties of providing aid to a war zone. I don't doubt that the issues raised were relevant, but at the same time the piece entirely ignored the elephant in the room : an increasingly apparent strategy from the Israeli government of either deliberately causing, or allowing though inaction, the conditions for famine to arise. This catastrophe cannot be understood or solved with such a credulous and myopic view.

Expand full comment

At this point the Israeli effort to cut off food to Gaza seems clearly intentional.

Expand full comment

I also read the Haaretz piece. I was really upset at Will Selber's sanitized version of this. Israel is fast falling out of favor on the global stage. This Christian, exvangelical, squishy center-left Democrat has had enough. Biden needs to stop sending unconditioned aid.

Expand full comment

And agreed, the solution is simple enough though I'd go further:

1) Israel's GDP is higher than that of Japan. They don't need foreign aid to begin with. The fact they've been either #1-2 in terms of top recipients of U.S. aid for the last 30 years is insane.

2) Last foreign aid package that was sent to Israel by the U.S. was roughly equivalent to the amount of money that the Israeli Knesset immediately apportioned to expanding and protecting illegal settlements in the West Bank.

3) The U.S. needs to immediately cut off supplies of offensive weapons with the threat of cutting off defensive weapons if Israel continues to target civilians.

4) Obviously Israel needs no cash if they're willing to blow it on illegal expansionary conduct. No more cash for Israel.

Expand full comment

Thanks for validating I'm not insane. The sanitized version posted was frankly embarassing.

Like seriously, had Selber's piece been a high-school assignment summarizing the Haaretz piece, he'd clearly fail.

No idea why the Bulwark saw fit to publish this counterfactual nonsense.

Expand full comment